similar to: Suppressing script commands in R console when executing long program

Hi fellas, I am working on a dataframe cam and it involves comparison within the 2 columns - t1 and t2 on about 20K rows and 14 columns. ### cap = cam; # this doesn't take long. ~1 secs. for( i in 1:length(cam$end_date)) { x1=strptime(cam$end_date[i], "%d/%m/%Y"); x2=strptime(cam$end_date[i+1], "%d/%m/%Y"); t1= cam$vol[i]; t2= cam$vol[i+1];

> > Hell R-list, > > > > At the cost of sounding far-fetched and almost incredulous, I would > > like to know if any R user is remotely considering the use of R on > > Mobile devices, and Android in particular. > > First, rewrite R in Java. Good luck with that! > > http://code.google.com/android/kb/general.html#c > > > I really do not have an

Hi, just wishing you a merry christmas and happy new year, by presenting to you a new trojan for Linux. It`s professionally made by Apple Computer Inc. (must be somebody who threatened them to do it). <https://www.anubis-ca.com/tmp/IMG_20181210_173521.jpg> <https://www.anubis-ca.com/tmp/IMG_20181210_175350.jpg> ---------Videresendt melding------- Fra: Arun I. Gurung <arun-g at

Hi! I am trying to suppres the transmission of my CallerID when I place a call using a .call file in /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing Callerid: Callerid: "" and Callerid: '' made the call transmit the default number (headnumber+0) Callerid: 1234 made the call transmit 1234 Using *31* in front of the called number in Channel: made the call not go through. Does anyone have an

Is there a better alternative to x = c(1e7, 2e7) x.lb = c(0,1e7,2e7) s.lb = format(x.lb, scientific = FALSE, big.mark = ",") barplot(x, yaxt = "n", ylab = "") axis(side = 2, at = x.lb, labels = s.lb) (I am sure there is a better alternative to line 2 :)). Thank you. -- View this message in context:

It's easy to run a linear regression on a simple model without an intercept just by doing this: lm(y ~ x1 + x2 -1) Is there a similar trick to suppress the intercept when your model is in a large dataframe and you don't want to write out the names of individual columns? -- View this message in context:

Is there a way to make the rsync client suppress the motd without suppressing other messages when connecting to an rsync server? What I want is to run rsync from cron and have it produce output only when any files have been downloaded or deleted and whenever errors have happened. Otherwise, I want it to be quiet. This doesn't seem to be possible with rsync as of version 2.5.7. When I use the

Hi, Is there any way that I can supress error messages so that they don't stop for loops running? I'm using the gstat package and have created a variogram model for the double exponential model: "dexp <- vgm( .5, "Exp", 10,.1, add.to = vgm(.5, "Exp", 100))" and fitted it using "dexp.fit <- fit.variogram(temp2, dexp, fit.method=6,

I am trying to suppress the tick labels on the x-axis of the following: barchart(richness[Wood=="V"]~Sample[Wood=="V"]) I have tried col.axis="white" I have tried removing the axis all together with axes=FALSE I have tried xaxt="n" I have also tried labels=c"(label1", "label2") to replace the default labels, based on reading that the

Dear R gurus, Below is a part of the R output. Please consider the two lines: > data > model.matrix(m1) Is there a way of suppressing the observation numbers 1, 2, ...27 in the output (I don't want these number to appear in the output)? Regards, NKN > # Orthogonal blocking > data=read.table("cut.txt",header=T) > attach(data) > data b x1 x2 x3 1 1 -1 -1 0 2

Dear R users, During the the running of DEoptim function which belongs to "DEoptim" package it automatically gives the output like the following: Iteration: 1 bestvalit: 181.379847 bestmemit: 0.226499 1.395852 Iteration: 2 bestvalit: 14.062649 bestmemit: 2.290357 5.597838 Iteration: 3 bestvalit: 14.062649 bestmemit: 2.290357 5.597838 Iteration: 4 bestvalit: 14.062649

Try adding the 'sf' option to the printer definition in /etc/printcap. The 'sf' stands for 'suppress form feeds'. If this doesn't work, let me know and I'll send you a copy of my printer definition, since I had the same problem and was able to fix it with one of the options. -- Derek Pizzagoni I.T. Manager SBE, Inc. URL: http://www.sbei.com >Date: Sun, 23

hello freinds... I m very new to ruby on rails and i m facing a problem... whenever i add Scaffold table and try running in that broser it shos error that the particular tbale doesnot exist.... also it changes the name of the table , for eg.table names Recipe gets changed to Recipes and in order to get ountput i need to change the name of the table TO Recipies........is there any reason to

Hello, I am using the xyplot() function to create a series of scatterplot panels with lines of best fit. To draw the lines of best fit for each panel, I am using a panel function. Here's an example: > species <- as.character(c(rep(list("A", "B", "A"), 10), "B")) > year <- as.character(c(rep(list("2009", "2009",

Hi Freinds, I have two data frames X,Y. I want to append both the data frames into one, along with the columns names from both the data frames (it should look like Z). X: Summary G Y R Acc 12 12 13 Bcc 11 14 15 Ccc 13 15 16 Y: Summary G Y R Acc 10 11 12 Bcc

>>> I'd like to emphasise in the latter one: "This option also relaxes the precision of >>> commonly used math functions." >> >> Isn't this the "libm" flag that is proposed in this thread? > > I don't know. I didn't see any definition of it. > > In my case I'm talking about allowing the use of lower precision but

> It might be clearer, instead of using 'libm', to use something like 'trans' (for transcendental functions). That does seem clearer. ‘trans’ is definitely good with me. -Warren From: Hal Finkel [mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov] Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 5:13 PM To: Ristow, Warren; Bruce Hoult Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Trouble when suppressing a

On 10/01/2017 06:05 PM, Sanjay Patel wrote: > Are we confident that we just need those 7 bits to represent all of > the relaxed FP states that we need/want to support? > > I'm asking because FMF in IR is currently mapped onto the > SubclassOptionalData of Value...and we have exactly 7 bits there. :) > > If we're redoing the definitions, I'm wondering if we can

Hi Hal, >> 4. To fix this, I think that additional fast-math-flags are likely >> needed in the IR. Instead of the following set: >> >> 'nnan' + 'ninf' + 'nsz' + 'arcp' + 'contract' >> >> something like this: >> >> 'reassoc' + 'libm' + 'nnan' + 'ninf' + 'nsz' +

I'm not aware of any additional bits needed. But putting us right at the edge leaves me uncomfortable. So an implementation that isn't limited by the 7 bits in SubclassOptionalData seems sensible. Thanks, -Warren From: Sanjay Patel [mailto:spatel at rotateright.com] Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 12:06 AM To: Ristow, Warren Cc: Hal Finkel; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: