similar to: analysis of categorical data

Dear list members, Any help on this efficiency issue would be greatly appreciated. I would like to find the most efficient way to run a non-vectorized function (here: fisher exact test p-value) iteratively using 4 matrices with identical dimensions. And as a result I aim for an array with identical dimensions containing the corresponding p-values. Please consider some code using a trivial

Dear R-help forum members, Suppose I have a data-frame having two variables and single data for each of them, as described below. variable_1           variable_2         10                          20 I have written a function, say, 'fun' which uses input 10 and 20 and gives me desired result. fun = function(X, Y)          {          X + Y              #( I am just giving an example of

With some chagrin after spending a couple of hours trying to debug a script, I realized I had typed in something like ans<-optimx(start, myfn, mygr, lower<-lo, upper=up) that is, the "<-" rather than "=". The outcome on my machine was a non-obvious error several layers deep in the call stack. For info, optim() seems to stop much more quickly. The error is

Dear all, I need to calculate tr(xyxy) fast for matrices x and y. Inspired by the R-source code, I've created the following functions (I am *new* to writing external C-functions, so feel free to laugh at my code - or, perhaps, suggest changes): #include <Rinternals.h> #include <R_ext/Applic.h> /* for dgemm */ static void matprod(double *x, int nrx, int ncx, double *y, int

Not an expert in programming either, but to me it seems like you've forgotten to initialize the variable "tr". It just picks up garbage from allocated memory previously initialized by other processes. Med venlig hilsen Frede Aakmann T?gersen > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch > [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] P?

Hi: I have two matrices, A and B, where A is n x k, and B is m x k, where n >> m >> k. Is there a computationally fast way to count the number of times each row (a k-vector) of B occurs in A? Thanks for any suggestions. Best, Ravi. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, If i add field observers to radio button fields they trigger once but then nothing after that. I have multiple fields in a form that i need to know if one of them changes and which spedific field. Below is an example of two foelds i tested and they trigger once with the alert but then nothing after that. I also tried individual observers for each field test_yes and test_no but with the same

Hi. I'm looking for an efficient way of writing a function(x,mat1,mat2). n<-4 m<-4 r<-3 x <- array(sample(1:1000)/10^4,rep.int(n,m)) mat1 <- matrix(sample(1:1000)/10^4,n,n) mat2 <- matrix(sample(1:1000)/10^4,n,n) It needs to work for *any* itegers n, r<=m with output (in horrible gory detail) equivalent to: ans<-array(0,rep.int(n,(m+1))) for(i1 in 1:n) for(i2 in

Hi, Reading about a "Heads and Tails" game in http://www.dartmouth.edu/~chance/teaching_aids/books_articles/probability_book/amsbook.mac.pdf Introduction to Probability (Example 1.4, pp. 5-8). You toss a coin 40 times. If heads, Peter wins $1, tails, he loses $1. I think I can do that ok with: winnings <- sum(sample(c(-1,1), 40, replace=TRUE)) But I have to do it 10,000 times

library(plyr) n<-100000 grp1<-sample(1:750, n, replace=T) grp2<-sample(1:750, n, replace=T) d<-data.frame(x=rnorm(n), y=rnorm(n), grp1=grp1, grp2=grp2) system.time({ d$avx1 <- ave(d$x, list(d$grp1, d$grp2)) d$avy1 <- ave(d$y, list(d$grp1, d$grp2)) }) # user system elapsed # 39.300 0.279 40.809 system.time({ d$avx2 <- ave(d$x, interaction(d$grp1, d$grp2, drop =

Hi, For the past few months I've been building a simulation in R I hope to package. It consists of two usable functions, and many internal ones which one of the two usable functions call while looping, to perform the stages of simulation. A simple conceptual example is: # Abstract representation 1st Usable function, generates object containing settings for simulation. settings <-

Hi, I have a list in which element is a vector (all of the same length and all numeric). I want to find the mean of the first elements of the vectors, the mean of the second elements of the vectors and so on. Currently I convert the list to a data.frame and apply rowMeans(). But is there a way to to do this directly on the list? I seem to recall a post in which there was such a function (or

Hey fellas: I would like to integrate the following function: integrand <- function (x,t) { exp(-2*t)*(2*t)^x/(10*factorial(x)) } with respect to the t variable, from 0 to 10. The variable x here works as a parameter: I would like to integrate the said function for each value of x in 0,1,..,44. I have tried Vectorize to no avail. Thanks in advance, jose romero

Hi, I am just wondering if there is an easy way to count in a numeric vector how many numbers don't have replicates. For example, a=c(1,1,2,2,3,4,5), how can I know there are three numbers (3, 4 and 5) without replicates? Thank you! Jun =====

Hi all, I have a relationship (no really!) class RiskMatrix < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :severities, :order => :position, :uniq => true end class RiskFactor < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :risk_matrix validates_presence_of :descriptor, :example validates_uniqueness_of :descriptor, :example, :scope=> :risk_matrix_id end class Severity < RiskFactor

Dear R users I have tried to install the optimx but met problems. I have gone to the website you suggested: https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=395 and tried to install it with the following method: install.packages("optimx", repos="http://R-Forge.R-project.org") I have received the following information: package 'numDeriv' successfully unpacked and MD5

On 2/8/07, Albrecht, Dr. Stefan (AZ Private Equity Partner) <stefan.albrecht at apep.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > Thanks a lot for your comments. > > I very well agree with you that writing efficient code is about optimisation. The most important rules I know would be: > - vectorization > - pre-definition of vectors, etc. > - use matrix instead of data.frame > - do

I have a value a=300 observation (x) = sample(1:50) How to find a p-value from this. I need to show that "a" is different fom mean(x). Thanks -- ------------- Mary Kindall Yorktown Heights, NY USA [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I would have thought that these two constructions would produce the same result but they do not. Resp <- rbinom(10, 1, 0.5) Stim <- rep(0:1, 5) mm <- model.matrix(~ Stim) Xb <- mm %*% c(0, 1) ifelse(Resp, log(pnorm(Xb)), log(1 - pnorm(Xb))) pnorm(as.vector(Xb), lower.tail = Resp, log.p = TRUE) > ifelse(Resp, log(pnorm(Xb)), log(1 - pnorm(Xb))) [1] -0.6931472 -1.8410216

Dear All, I am running a simulation to obtain coverage probability of Wald type confidence intervals for my parameter d in a function of two parameters (mu,d). I am optimizing it using "optim" method "L-BFGS-B" to obtain MLE. As, I want to invert the Hessian matrix to get Standard errors of the two parameter estimates. However, my Hessian matrix at times becomes