similar to: Unique command not deleting all duplicate rows

Dear R-help, I am having trouble with your scatterplot3d program. For help with this problem I was directed to your address by Martin Maechler at " r-core-bounces at r-project.org." I'm also sending a CC to " r-core-owner at r-project.org" as I'm not yet certain of the proper address to use for this. I have R version 2.8.1 and have downloaded 'scatterplot3d.'

Hello everyone, Merging two dataframes should be easy. However when I try to merge, R doesn't recognize identical values, even if I am doing it by values that have no decimals. willclayong: vs30 LON LAT Net X wills.cat wills.vs30 clahan.cat clahanvs30 PolyID.wills PolyID.clahan tif.cat STA ELEVATION tif.vs30 1 338.539 -3849590 4319319 <NA> 2 D 301

I am pretty sure that I came across a function that creates a vector of levels from a list but I just can't remember. Basically, I have something like > t <- list(A=c(4,1,4),B=c(3,7,9,2)) > t $A [1] 4 1 4 $B [1] 3 7 9 2 And I would like to get something like the following: t levels 4 1 1 1 4 1 3 2 7 2 9 2 2 2 I tried unlist without success. I also do remember that there is a

Dear R gurus, On the CRAN website, it says that a 64bit version for Mac OS Tiger would be release shortly. Do we know what are the expected dates? Will the packages be also compiled for 64bit? We are running large microarray analysis and we keep hitting the 3Gb memory limit. I saw that there is a version available on the development mirrors, but I am not too excited to replace our very stable

Dear R gurus, I have a very embarrassingly parallelizable job that I am trying to speed up with snow on our local cluster. Basically, I am doing ~50,000 t.test for a series of micro-array experiments, one gene at a time. Thus, I can easily spread the load across multiple processors and nodes. So, I have a master list object that tells me what rows to pick up for each genes to do the t.test from

When I call meetme: exten => 1000,1,Answer exten => 1000,n,Meetme(|||d) Asterisk is complaing with: -- Executing Answer("IAX2/xxx.yyy.142.204:4569-2", "") in new stack -- Executing MeetMe("IAX2/xxx.yyy.142.204:4569-2", "|||d") in new stack -- Playing 'conf-getconfno' (language 'en') Warning, flexible rate not

Dear all, I am running anova(lm()) on a series of different data frame and I am getting the following message Using dataFrame$levels as id variables 1. Why am I getting that message 2. How do I suppress it (or correct it). Thanks Marco -- Marco Blanchette, Ph.D. Assistant Investigator Stowers Institute for Medical Research 1000 East 50th St. Kansas City, MO 64110 Tel: 816-926-4071

Since I'm a SAS programmer, I'm used to creating command files in an editor for submission later. Is there a way to do this in R? I'd need to retain an ouput listing and a log to check for errors. _________________________________________________________________ Send e-mail faster without improving your typing skills. d_122008 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, I am processing a very long and complicated list using lapply through a custom function and I would like to generate some sort of progress report. For instance, print a dot on the screen every time 1000 item have been process. Or even better, reporting the percent of the list that have been process every 10%. However, I can't seem to figure out a way to achieve that. For instance,

Hi, I get this error: ------------------ ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (first use this function) ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) ------------------ And the config.log shows that configure has detected that ld on my platform (Interix) doesn't support shared libraries: ------------------

Hi again Does cygwin support shared libraries. And if not, how did you port llvm on this issue? /Henrik >From: "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> >Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:41:53 +0200 > >Hi, > >I get this error: >------------------ >ToolRunner.cpp:396: error: `SHLIBEXT' undeclared (first use this function) >ToolRunner.cpp:396:

TL;DR: Time Machine cannot create a *new* backup on my shared drive, but can add to an *existing* backup. I'm running macOS Catalina and my Time Machine backs up to a Debian 10 server with NetAtalk and Avahi. Since Mavericks macOS has preferred SMB, and given SMB is marginally faster I decided to switch to using SMB for the Time Machine shares. On a fresh AFP share I can start a new Time

=================================================================== "Originality is the fine art of remembering what you hear but forgetting where you heard it." Laurence J. Peter ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba

=================================================================== "Originality is the fine art of remembering what you hear but forgetting where you heard it." Laurence J. Peter ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba

Any help here? I have included all of the output of the suggested diags that Thomas said I should run, but I admit that I'm not sure what I'm looking for, as I'm not familiar with RPC functionality on Linux. Something is not working with RPC on my Samba 4.0.3 server. (FWIW, it doesn't work with IPTables stopped either.) > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Mike Stroven wrote:

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hi, It is since a while on different distributions that i can't compile samba --with-pam I download 2.2.8a ./configure --with-pam And i always get: 1)config.log 2)screen dump 1) this is the config.log file This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. configure:814: checking for gcc configure:927: checking

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability