similar to: Quick explanation of model output

Hello I believe that I'm getting very close in my modeling application. I've come across a challenge that I am unable to solve and would really appreciate the group's opinion. I've been using the val.prob function from the Design library (Thanks Frank!!) to both evaluate and visualize my model. From the scores and graph, it appears as my model is very accurate in

I receive the following meteo dataset regularly, containing the average daily temperatures (tMedia) of a certain month for 24 selected meteo-stations (COD_WMO) whose human-readable names are in (NOME). str(tabella) `data.frame': 1038 obs. of 4 variables: $ COD_WMO: int 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 ... $ NOME : Factor w/ 24 levels

Hi, I'm sure this is simple, but I haven't been able to find this in TFM, say I have some data in R like this (pasted here: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=sjS9Zkup): > head(df) gender age smokes disease Y 1 female 65 ever control 0.18 2 female 77 never control 0.12 3 male 40 state1 0.11 4 female 67 ever control 0.20 5 male 63 ever state1 0.16

Buenas tardes ¿Cómo puedo controlar el tiempo que demora en ejecutarse una rutina de forma automática? Probé con proc.time()pero no es automático, tengo que pararlo yo. Muchas gracias como siempre -- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hey Everyone, I?m down to 1 last error that I know I created on my own but I can?t figure out how to fix it? Here is the error that I?m getting: Apr 3 04:29:37 ip-172-31-24-2 postfix/qmgr[20458]: EFE01423E2: from=<me at spike.net>, size=359, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 3 04:29:37 ip-172-31-24-2 dovecot: lda(beth at primelashdiva.info): Fatal: setresgid(89(postfix),89(postfix),97(dovecot))

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > Ralf, et al., > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > additional benchmark results. > > First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things > necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the

Jason Pruim pruimj at gmail.com 352.234.3175 > On Apr 2, 2016, at 6:42 PM, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > > Am 03.04.2016 um 00:26 schrieb Jason Pruim: >> Hey Edgar, >> >> Thanks for catching that! Missed it earlier! Got it changed but I?m still having the same error updated postconf -n: > > Why do you provide the Postfix

Ralf, et al., Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains additional benchmark results. First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the machine, bind the processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for discussion.

Hello, Using the following lines of code, I created the following graph:

Hello, Using the following lines of code, I created the following graph:

Hello, I did a cross-validation using cvlm from DAAG package but wasn't sure how to assess the result. Does this result means my model is a good model? I understand that the overall ms is the mean of sum of squares. But is 0.0987 a good number? The response (i.e. gailRel5yr) has min,1st Quantile, median, mean and 3rd Quantile, and max as follows: (0.462, 0.628, 0.806, 0.896, 1.000, 2.400) ?

Dear all, I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB of RAM. I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time Series" by Ruey Tsay. In R I'm using the fGarch library. After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model > model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse) I'm saving the results via > result<-model

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory YYYY:NNN <url> The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files: ----------------------------------------------------------- The above will present the format of CentOS-4.2/alpha CESA-announcements. Here the 'alpha' is for axp and arch is labeled as 'axp' on subjects as 'alpha'

Hi,All I setup traffic control configuration with HTB this way: 1: root HTB qdisc | 1:1 HTB class rate 1024kbit | /-----+-----+-----+------+-----\ 1:10 1:20 1:30 1:40 1:50 1:60 EF AF41 AF31 AF21 AF11 BE and alloct different bandwidth to these PHBs(queues).So which tool would I use to generate these packets at the same to for

sorry, here is the correct link to the MPEGplus explanation by Andree Buschmann: http://www.personal.uni-jena.de/~pfk/mpp/audiocoder_english.html -- p-h-g _____________________________________________________________________ Envie de discuter en "live" avec vos amis ? Télécharger MSN Messenger http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/m la 1ère messagerie instantanée de France --- >8 ----

HI Utpal, Alight, I will look into it.? I was under the impression that this is what you wanted: dat1<- structure(list(V1 = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L), V2 = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L), V3 = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L), ??? V4 = c(1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L), V5 = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, ??? 1L, 0L, 1L), V6 = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L), V7 = c(1L, ??? 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L), V8 = c(1L,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4488 ------- Comment #1 from matt at mattmccutchen.net 2009-09-13 16:28 CST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Having an unreadable (unix permissions set to no read access) directory within > the source directory causes a complaint that is apparently considered an I/O > error and therefore prevents --delete and --delete-excluded from acting

Hello all, I was wondering if someone could give me a brief explanation of how :scope works. I believe I''ve seen it used with the validation helpers in the past. - Jim

Hi,? I have made violin plot with both ggplot2 and vioplot package with same data.? The results and code are as follows.? ################### ?Loading data? data.melt <- dget("https://gubox.box.com/shared/static/rirth0eym114afwyjxwe128sjzipzdym.txt") ################### ?Violin plot by library(vioplot) library(vioplot) data.use_11<- data.melt$value[data.melt$ident == 0]

Hi Bill, > ... Still, people would break the builds and let > things go for hours or days at a time. don't forget the time-zone effect. I regularly get build failures in the morning, presumably because someone in the US committed just before going to bed. I guess they are happily snoring away when the build-bots (and humans) start complaining! So when hours go by without a fix, it