similar to: Help with Logit Model

Posted about this earlier. Didn't receive any response But, some further research leads me to believe that MAYBE a GLMM or a GEE function will do what I need. Hello, I have a bit of a tricky puzzle with trying to implement a logit model as described in a paper. The particular paper is on horseracing and they explain a model that is a logit trained "per race", yet somehow the

Hello I believe that I'm getting very close in my modeling application. I've come across a challenge that I am unable to solve and would really appreciate the group's opinion. I've been using the val.prob function from the Design library (Thanks Frank!!) to both evaluate and visualize my model. From the scores and graph, it appears as my model is very accurate in

Hi All, When modeling with glm and family = binomial (link = logit) and response values of 0 and 1, I get the predicted probabilities of assigning to my class one, then I would like to compare it with my vector y which does have the original labels. How should I change the probabilities into values of zero and 1 and then compare it with my vector y to find out about the accuracy of my

Dear all, I am fitting a LOGIT model on this Data........... Data <- structure(c(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 47, 58, 82, 100, 222, 164, 161, 70, 219, 81, 209, 182, 185, 104, 126, 192, 95, 245, 97, 177, 125, 56, 85, 199, 298, 145, 78, 144, 178, 146, 132, 98, 120, 148, 123, 282, 79, 34, 104,

Dear R-Help, I'm hoping to find a Multinomial Nested Logit package in R. It would be great to find something analogous to "PROC MDC" in SAS: > The MDC (Multinomial Discrete Choice) procedure analyzes models > where the > choice set consists of multiple alternatives. This procedure > supports conditional logit, > mixed logit, heteroscedastic extreme value,

I'm trying to run a logit model and plot the probability curve for a number of the important predictors. I'm trying to do this with the Effects package. df=data.frame(income=c(5,5,3,3,6,5), won=c(0,0,1,1,1,0), age=c(18,18,23,50,19,39), home=c(0,0,1,0,0,1)) str(df) md1 = glm(factor(won) ~ income + age + home, data=df,

Hello, Could anybody provide me with codes (procedure) how to obtain Conditional Logit (McFadden) and Mixed Logit (say, assuming normal distribution) estimates in R? Thanks, David U. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Conditional-Logit-and-Mixed-Logit-tf4489238.html#a12802959 Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hello, I'm brand new to using R. (I've been using Rapid Miner, but would like to move over to R since it gives me much more functionality.) I'm trying to learn how to do a conditional logit model. My data has one dependent variable, 2 independent variables and a "group" variable. example: class v1 v2 group "sick" .3 .7 1 "well"

I'm running a multinomial logit in R using the Zelig packages. According to str(trade962a), my dependent variable is a factor with three levels. When I run the multinomial logit I get an error message. However, when I run 'model=logit' it works fine. any ideas on whats wrong? ## MULTINOMIAL LOGIT anes96two <- zelig(trade962a ~ age962 + education962 + personal962 + economy962 +

Hi I am carrying out some logit regressions and want to (a) make sure I'm taking the right approach and (b) work out how to carry out some additional analysis. So, to carry out a logit regression where the dependent variable is a factor db, I use something like: res1_l <- glm(formula = db ~ y1 + + y5, family = binomial(link = "logit")) summary(res1_l) ...which is, I hope

Hi, I've been testing some models with the MCMCpack library. I can run the process and get a nice model "object". I can easily see the summary and even plot it. I can't seem to figure out how to: 1) Access the final coefficients in the model 2) Turn the coefficients into a model so I can then run predictions using them. A summary command will SHOW Me the coefficients, but

Hello R community, I have a question about the logistic regression function. Specifically, when the predictor variable has not just 0's and 1's, but also fractional values (between zero and one). I get a warning when I use the "glm(formula = ... , family = binomial(link = "logit"))" which says: "In eval(expr, envir, enclos) : non-integer #successes in a binomial

# Hello R Users, # # I would like to fit a glm model with quasi family and # logistical link function, but this does not seam to work # with binary data. # # Please don't suggest to use the quasibinomial family. This # works out, but when applied to the true data, the # variance function does not seams to be # appropriate. # # I couldn't see in the # theory why this does not work. # Is

Hello dear r-gurus! I have a question about the logit-model. I think I have misunderstood something and I'm trying to find a bug from my code or even better from my head. Any help is appreciated. The question is shortly: why I'm not having same coefficients from the logit-regression when using a link-function and an explicite transformation of the dependent. Below some details. I'm

I got the following warning messages when I did a binomial logit regression using glm(): Warning messages: 1: Algorithm did not converge in: glm.fit(x = X, y = Y, weights = weights, start = start, etastart = etastart, 2: fitted probabilities numerically 0 or 1 occurred in: glm.fit(x = X, y = Y, weights = weights, start = start, etastart = etastart, Can some one share your thoughts on how to

Good morning, I'd like to estimate a simple multinomial logit model in R (not a McFadden conditional logit). For instance, I'd like to estimate the probability of someone having one of eight titles in a company with the independent variables being the company characteristics. A binary logit is well documented. What about the multinomial? Thanks, Walt Paczkowski

Hello, I'd like to fit a logit function to my data. The data is distributed like a logit (like in this plot on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Logit.png) but the values on the x-axis are not between 0 and 1. I don't think using a glm is the solution because I simply want to infer the parameters of the logit function (offset, compression, slope...), so I can apply it to all

I have a logit model with about 10 predictors and I am trying to plot the probability curve for the model. Y=1 = 1 / 1+e^-z where z=B0 + B1X1 + ... + BnXi If the model had only one predictor, I know to do something like below. mod1 = glm(factor(won) ~ as.numeric(bid), data=mydat, family=binomial(link="logit")) all.x <- expand.grid(won=unique(won), bid=unique(bid)) y.hat.new

Hi I am trying to make glm() work to analyze a toy logit system. I have a dataframe with x and y independent variables. I have L=1+x-y (ie coefficients 1,1,-1) then if I have a logit relation with L=log(p/(1-p)), p=1/(1+exp(L)). If I interpret "p" as the probability of success in a Bernouilli trial, and I can observe the result (0 for "no", 1 for

Dear all, I am using glm function in order to estimate a logit model i.e. glm(Y ~ data[,2] + data[,3], family = binomial(link = "logit")). I also created a function that estimates logit model and I would like it to compare it with the glm function. So, does anyone know what optimizer or optimization method glm uses in order to derive the result? Thank you Dimitris -- View this