similar to: Fitted values and MSE of individual fits in lmList

I have been using random forest on a data set with 226 sites and 36 explanatory variables (continuous and categorical). When I use "tune.randomforest" to determine the best value to use in "mtry" there is a fairly consistent and steady decrease in MSE, with the optimum of "mtry" usually equal to 1. Why would that occur, and what does it signify? What I would

Several ways: 1. Read ?randomForest, especially the `Value' section. 2. Look at str(myforest.rf). 3. Look at print.randomForest. If the forest has 100 trees, then the mse and rsq are vectors with 100 elements each, the i-th element being the mse (or rsq) of the forest consisting of the first i trees. So the last element is the mse (or rsq) of the whole forest. HTH, Andy > From: David

Dear all, I dont know where I can find the 'Mean Square Error" function? Any hint would be appreciated. Best Regards -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !)

Dear R Users, My question is overall and not necessarily related to R. Suppose we face to a situation in which MSE( Mean Squared Error) shows desired results but Bias shows undesired ones, Or in advers. How can we evaluate the results. And suppose, Both MSE and Bias are important for us. The ecact question is that, whether there is any combined measure of two above metrics. Thank you so

I've run the function randomForest with importance=T. All my variables (predictors and the dependent variable) are numeric. rf<-randomForest(formula, data=mydata, importance=T, etc.) my results object "rf" contains predictor importances: rf$importance I am seeing two columns: %IncMSE IncNodePurity V1 -0.01683558 58.10910 V2 0.04000299 71.27579 V3 0.01974636

Hello - I am using glmnet to generate a model for multiple cohorts i. For each i, I run 5 separate models, each with a different x variable. I want to compare the fit statistic for each i and x combination. When I use auc, the output is in some cases is < .5 (.49). In addition, if I compare mean MSE (with upper and lower bounds) ... there is no difference across my various x variables, but

Dear R-experts, Here below my R code with an error message. Can somebody help me to fix this error?? Really appreciate your help. Best, ############################################################ #?MSE CROSSVALIDATION Lasso regression? library(glmnet) ?

No error message shown Please include the error message so that it is not necessary to rerun your code. This might enable someone to see the problem without running the code (e.g. downloading packages, etc.) -- Bert On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 1:36?PM varin sacha via R-help <r-help at r-project.org> wrote: > > Dear R-experts, > > Here below my R code with an error message. Can

Dear R-experts, I really thank you all a lot for your responses. So, here is the error (and warning) messages at the end of my R code. Many thanks for your help. Error in UseMethod("predict") : ? no applicable method for 'predict' applied to an object of class "c('matrix', 'array', 'double', 'numeric')" > mean(unlist(lst)) [1] NA

?s 20:12 de 23/10/2023, varin sacha via R-help escreveu: > Dear R-experts, > > I really thank you all a lot for your responses. So, here is the error (and warning) messages at the end of my R code. > > Many thanks for your help. > > > Error in UseMethod("predict") : > ? no applicable method for 'predict' applied to an object of class

For what it's worth it looks like spm2 is specifically for *spatial* predictive modeling; presumably its version of CV is doing something spatially aware. I agree that glmnet is old and reliable. One might want to use a tidymodels wrapper to create pipelines where you can more easily switch among predictive algorithms (see the `parsnip` package), but otherwise sticking to glmnet