similar to: A category reduction problem

Earlier today I sent a question to Frank Harrell as an R developer with whom I am most familiar. He suggested also that I put my questions to the list for additional responses. Next month I'll be giving a talk on R as an example of high quality open source software. I think there is much to learn from R as a high quality extensible product that (at least as far as I can tell) has never

Hi, Evaluation of pivoted normalization ("PPP") of tf-idf weighting scheme is also complete now. I have also evaluated the default tf-idf normalization ("ntn") and other normalizations combinations involving pivoted normalization in wdfn, idfn and wtn component as "Pxx", "xPx" and "xxP" normalization strings respectively to have a clear idea about

Hi, all When I am using mle.cv(wle), I find a interesting problem: I can't do leave-one-out cross-validation with mle.cv(wle). I will illustrate the problem as following: > xx=matrix(rnorm(20*3),ncol=3) > bb=c(1,2,0) > yy=xx%*%bb+rnorm(20,0,0.001)+0 > summary(mle.cv(yy~xx,split=nrow(xx)-1,monte.carlo=2*nrow(xx),verbose=T), num.max=1)[[1]] mle.cv: dimension of the split subsample

Using R 2.6.2, say I have the following list of lists, "comb": data1 <- list(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3) data2 <- list(a = 4, b = 5, c = 6) data3 <- list(a = 3, b = 6, c = 9) comb <- list(data1 = data1, data2 = data2, data3 = data3) So that all names for the lowest level list are common. How can I most efficiently access all of the sublist items "a" indexed by the outer

Thanks alot. How can we view those optimization which are enabled when we do llc -O3 comb.ll Are these the same as the ones produced by the following command line llvm-as < /dev/null | opt -O3 -disable-output -debug-pass=Arguments Regards Shahzad On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> Yes. But how exactly code generation (optimized one)

Thanks again. I executed the following command line llc -O3 comb.ll.bc -debug-pass=Arguments and got Pass Arguments: -targetdata -targetpassconfig -no-aa -tbaa -targetlibinfo -basicaa -collector-metadata -machinemoduleinfo -machine-branch-prob -preverify -domtree -verify -loops -loop-simplify -scalar-evolution -loop-simplify -iv-users -loop-reduce -gc-lowering -unreachableblockelim

Hi, On 12/06/12 13:09, Abdul Wahid Memon wrote: > Thanks alot. How can we view those optimization which are enabled when we do > > llc -O3 comb.ll llc -O3 comb.ll -debug-pass=Arguments > > Are these the same as the ones produced by the following command line no, as I mentioned before they are of a completely different nature to the optimizations that opt does. Ciao, Duncan.

Hi, > I executed the following command line > > llc -O3 comb.ll.bc -debug-pass=Arguments > > and got > > Pass Arguments: -targetdata -targetpassconfig -no-aa -tbaa > -targetlibinfo -basicaa -collector-metadata -machinemoduleinfo > -machine-branch-prob -preverify -domtree -verify -loops -loop-simplify > -scalar-evolution -loop-simplify -iv-users -loop-reduce

> Yes. But how exactly code generation (optimized one) be done without > clang. Is it possible that we can specify those optimization > (individual ones instead of standard ones like -O3) some how when > generating code as is done by clang or llc? llc comb.ll gcc -o comb comb.s Variants: llc -O0 comb.ll llc -O3 comb.ll etc Note that the codegen level optimizations done by llc

Hi, ? Is there some easy way to split the grid.newpage() into two columns? For example, how could I put the two forest plots below (meta1 and meta2) next to each other? library(meta) data(Olkin95) meta1 <- metabin(event.e, n.e, event.c, n.c,data=Olkin95, subset=c(41,47,51,59),sm="RR", meth="I",studlab=author) meta2=meta1 meta2$studlab=rep("",length(meta1$studlab)

Trying to do a meta-analysis of correlations in R using the meta package; have tried several things and keep getting a similar error. Can anyone help explain the error? > cor<-c(-0.3018, 0.667, -3.8002, -0.607, -0.4885, -3.8002, -0.0701, 0.1348, -0.9505, -0.5709, -0.6127, -1.2419, -0.1511, -0.1054)> n<-c(3,4,3,3,3,3,16,36,30,9,3,3,30,4)> library(meta)> metacor(cor, n, data=NULL,

Hi, I need some help on integrating a function that is a vector. I have a function - vector which each element is different. And, naturally, function integrate() does not work I checked the article of U. Ligges and J. Fox (2008) about code optimization "How Can I Avoid This Loop or Make It Faster?" on http://promberger.info/files/rnews-vectorvsloops2008.pdf. Their advice did not help

if i were to have a block size of 4 people and i want to assign a treatment combination to the entire block, there would be 16 different treatment combinations (TTTT, TTTP, TTPP, PTTP, etc.) i am trying to get all 16 permutations and i am able to use this code below. drugs=c('P','T'); comb=expand.grid(drugs,drugs,drugs,drugs) for a block size of 3 the code would be

Dear Prof.Thank you for your kind response. I have only used: install.packages("tidyverse") install.packages("meta") install.packages("metafor") library(tidyverse) library(meta) library(metafor)and then,forest.meta(hidemeta, layout="RevMan5", xlab="Proportion", comb.r=T, comb.f=F, xlim = c(0,1), fontsize=10, digits=3)Unfortunately I am not

Hi, I have many files containing one column of data. I like to use the scan function to parse the data. Next I like to bind to a large vector. I try this like: count<-1 files <- list.files() # all files in the working directory for(i in files) { tmp <- scan(i) assign(files[count], tmp) count<-count+1 } This part works! Now I like to plot the data in a boxplot.

All, In the function below I have 24 individuals and 6 calculations per individual. The 6 calculations are collected each time in a 1:24 loop when calculating "delta". I'd like to collect all 144 = 24*6 calculations in one vector ("delta.patient.comb"). The function works as is via indexing, but is there an easier way to collect the measurements via appendinng the 6

Hi, > Yes, they both are exactly the same. then I don't know what is going on. I suggest you send a copy of comb.ll to the list so that we can see for ourselves. Ciao, Duncan. > > Regards > > Shahzad > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> Hi, is the comb.ll used here: >> >> >>> $ time lli

Hi all, i have the following setup PSTN -> routing server (asterisk 1.6.2.11) -> IAX -> callcenter asterisk 1.6.2.9 -> SIP -> agent Does work quit fine - then agent does have the abibility to transfer a call to a third party - the agent can initiate the transfer over a web interface - it does generate a asterisk manager atxfer request... So agent does initiate transfer - call

Hi, I was trying to overlay/combine two freqpoly plots. The sample code below illustrates the problem. Essentially, I want to do is: 1. Have the same colour for all the lines in 'Plot 1' (and 'Plot 2'). Currently, all the lines in Plot 1 have different colours and all the lines in Plot 2 have different colors. I'd like for all lines in Plot 1 to be 'red' and all

Hi friends, I need to generate a list, that should contain the quantile value of one column in a data frame. while I am compiling this one i am facing one bug,, Really I cannot find out that where the problem has occurred? Could any one help me to come out from this bug?? Here is the code, data <- lapply(comb.data$zFE, function(x) aggregate(x,