similar to: classes and methods

Hello, Thomas Stabla (statho3@web.de) has already sent this question to R-help, Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:21:31 +0100, but we are not sure whether we should better post this mail to this audience than to R-help: --------------------------------------------------------------------- We are using S4-classes and want to force a validity check when an object is created. How can this be done, when an

Dear useRs and wizaRds, I am currently developing a set of functions using S4 classes. On the way I encountered the problem exemplified with the code below. For some reason the 'validity' method does not seem to work, i.e. does not check for errors in the specification of the slots of the defined class. Any hints? My understanding of the whole S4 system was that validity checks are made

Hi, When called with complete=TRUE, validObject() is supposed to work in a recursive manner. But here is a situation where it doesn't seem to be the case. Let's define a class with a validity method: setClass("PosInts", representation(ii="integer")) setValidity("PosInts", function(object) { if (!all(object at ii > 0))

Dear all Below is the code for "scriptPreFilter.R" which gives the following result: > source("scriptPreFilter.R") > prefltr <- new("PreFilter", mad=c(0.5,0.01)) [1] "------initialize:PreFilter------" [1] "------initialize:Filter------" > str(prefltr) Formal class 'PreFilter' [package ".GlobalEnv"] with 2 slots

Hey everyone, I would like to develop a package using S4 classes. I have to define several S4 classes that inherits from each others as follow: # A <- B <- C <- D I also would like to define .DollarNames methods for these class so, if I have understood well, I also have to define an old class as follow: # AOld <- A <- B <- C <- D setOldClass(Classes = "AOld")

Hi all, I am having trouble extending S4 classes in cases where I'm using both validity and initialize methods. I've read as much S4 information as I can find, but I've yet to have that "a-ha" moment. In my application, I am using validity methods to guard against inappropriate input data that my code has no way of handling, and initialize methods to detect and deal

Hello list, I'm having troubles setting up a basic calss hierarchy with S4. Here is a simplified schema of what I'd like to do: - Two classes: A and B that extends A - Ensure that the slots added by B are consistent with the slots of A - Let A initialize itself (I'm not supposed to know the internal cooking of A) - By default set the slots of B based on the slots that A initialized

Hello, I would like to create a function that gets passed a class name and then calls setClass, and a few other functions, inside. I have done this in the past with setmethod, creating accessors for all slots in a set of S4 classes. But setClass is choking when my function is called isnide a package, telling about an error in exists(cname, where). I assume this to be a problem with the

Suppose you have a class, say sex, for lack of a better example, and you are tempted, in defining the behavior of the call, is(x,"sex") to check whether certain basic features are satisfied, not to just trust the claim that x is specified to be of class "sex". `Without delving into details further sanity checking of the structure of the object is sometimes prudent to avoid

Hi, This is a long-standing bug where 'class(object)' does not return the actual class of 'object' when used inside a validity method. Instead it seems to return the class for which the validity method is defined. For example: setClass("A", slots=c(stuff="ANY")) setValidity("A", function(object) { cat("validating an object of

Hi Suppose I have an S4 class "foo" and a validity checking function ".checkfoo()": setClass("foo", representation=representation("numeric")) setValidity("foo" , .checkfoo) is fine; in my application, .checkfoo() verifies that a bunch of necessary conditions are met. But .checkfoo() is very time consuming and I want to give users the option

I would like to add a class to the SparseM package. I have a class "matrix.csr" that describes a matrix in compressed sparse row format, now I would like a class matrix.diag.csr that describes such objects when they happen to be diagonal. The idea is that matrix.diag.csr objects should behave (later in life) exactly like matrix.csr objects, the distinction is only needed in order to

Hi,   I'm reading up on S4 classes *). There seem to be at least two ways of input validation: setClass() (using the 'validity' argument)  and setValidity(). Is it a matter of taste which function is used? Or should more complex validation code better be put in a setValiditity call? *) A (Not So) Short Introduction to S4 Object Oriented Programming in R V0.5.1 Christophe Genolini

Dear all, Maybe, I am doing something wrong, but using R-2.5.0 on my Intel-Mac, I have problems using function callNextMethod() in method initialize. I am loading the following code as file "testS4.R": setClass("baseClass", representation(myname = "character", mydir = "character", "VIRTUAL"),

Hi, The man page for new() suggests that if 'a' is an object with slots "slot1" and "slot2" and C is a class that extends the class of 'a', then the 2 following calls should be equivalent: new("C", a, ...) new("C", slot1=a at slot1, slot2=a at slot2, ...) This is generally the case but I just ran into a situation where it's not.

Dear Developers, In current implementation of validity method, objects are first coerced to superclass (slots are striped). Thus, it is not possible to write validity method which would perform some checks on children slots. Say, I want to check if number of slots in a class is equal to "n": setClass("A", representation(a="numeric", n="integer"),

I thought that 'validity' defined in 'setClass' should be called in 'new'. Could somebody let me know why 'validity' is not called? How to make it be called? > setClass( + Class='A', + representation=representation( + x='numeric' + ), + validity=function(object){ + cat("~~~ A: inspector ~~~\n") +

Folks, My object oriented background is in Java and C++. I am a novice to using S4/object-oriented coding in R but not to R. Below is an example that I found that I have expanded on. I am not getting how "prototype" and "initialize" work together, if at all. Here is output from a short "session" > setClass("xx", +

Thanks Martin for looking into this. H. On 05/13/2015 03:57 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> >>>>>> on Tue, 12 May 2015 15:18:42 -0700 writes: > >> Hi, > >> The man page for new() suggests that if 'a' is an object with slots >> "slot1" and "slot2" and C is a

Dear all, To explain my problem I am attaching a demonstration package "myclasspkg": I have the following two S4 classes with similar inheritance: SubSubClassA <- SubClassB <- BaseClass SubSubClassB <- SubClassB <- BaseClass In R I am calling the following functions: > library(myclasspkg) > subA <-