http://www.shorewall.net/VPNBasics.html#tunnels The /etc/shorewall/tunnels file provides no functionality that could not be implemented using entries in /etc/shorewall/rules and I have elimination of the /etc/shorewall/tunnels file as a long-term goal. Is this still the case? Is using rules preferable? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> http://www.shorewall.net/VPNBasics.html#tunnels > > The /etc/shorewall/tunnels file provides no functionality that could not > be > implemented using entries in /etc/shorewall/rules and I have elimination > of > the /etc/shorewall/tunnels file as a long-term goal. > > Is this still the case? Is using rules preferable?I hope the /etc/shorewall/tunnels file will stay where it is (and where it was for a couple of years now). Of course it can also be done with rules but I like having tunnels configured in the tunnels file. Simon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk