Hi All I have created a macro called macro.CRM to handle a special CRM package my customer''s dealers use to order caravans and track them through assemply and delivery. Works very well. I just have a line in my rules file to take care of the rule side CRM(DNAT) net loc:192.168.9.4 - 19X.YYY.ZZZ.123 And that works fine too! We have just recently added a second ISP connection, first on a shared network card and today cut over to two the new card. No problems there! I now need to give the customer a bit of a load sharing solution. The mail is no great shakes as it is on the firewall but the CRM server is needless to say a winblows thingie! So the question is! Can I add a second CRM(DNAT) rule like this? CRM(DNAT) net loc:192.168.9.4 - 172.21.1.2 (172.21.1.2 because it is a MikroTik wifi Point to Point link and the MikroTik DNAT''s every thing over!) I cannot really see any problem. But maybe two or more DNAT''s is a no no! Never had any need to do it before either! Ball now in your court! I''m off to bed! Ang -- Angela Williams angierfw at gmail dot com Linux/Networking Hacker Blog http://angierfw.wordpress.com Smile! Yeshua Loves You! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today''s security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
On 6/4/12 2:10 PM, Angela Williams wrote:> Hi All > > I have created a macro called macro.CRM to handle a special CRM package > my customer''s dealers use to order caravans and track them through > assemply and delivery. Works very well. > I just have a line in my rules file to take care of the rule side > > CRM(DNAT) net loc:192.168.9.4 - 19X.YYY.ZZZ.123 > > And that works fine too! > > We have just recently added a second ISP connection, first on a shared > network card and today cut over to two the new card. No problems there! > > I now need to give the customer a bit of a load sharing solution. The > mail is no great shakes as it is on the firewall but the CRM server is > needless to say a winblows thingie! > > So the question is! Can I add a second CRM(DNAT) rule like this? > > CRM(DNAT) net loc:192.168.9.4 - 172.21.1.2 > > (172.21.1.2 because it is a MikroTik wifi Point to Point link and the > MikroTik DNAT''s every thing over!) > > I cannot really see any problem. But maybe two or more DNAT''s is a no > no! Never had any need to do it before either! > > Ball now in your court! I''m off to bed!That will work fine, provided that you have ''track'' on both providers. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today''s security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
Hi All! On 06/05/12 01:15, Tom Eastep wrote:> On 6/4/12 2:10 PM, Angela Williams wrote: >> Hi All >> >> I have created a macro called macro.CRM to handle a special CRM package >> my customer''s dealers use to order caravans and track them through >> assemply and delivery. Works very well. >> I just have a line in my rules file to take care of the rule side >> >> CRM(DNAT) net loc:192.168.9.4 - 19X.YYY.ZZZ.123 >> >> And that works fine too! >> >> We have just recently added a second ISP connection, first on a shared >> network card and today cut over to two the new card. No problems there! >> >> I now need to give the customer a bit of a load sharing solution. The >> mail is no great shakes as it is on the firewall but the CRM server is >> needless to say a winblows thingie! >> >> So the question is! Can I add a second CRM(DNAT) rule like this? >> >> CRM(DNAT) net loc:192.168.9.4 - 172.21.1.2 >> >> (172.21.1.2 because it is a MikroTik wifi Point to Point link and the >> MikroTik DNAT''s every thing over!) >> >> I cannot really see any problem. But maybe two or more DNAT''s is a no >> no! Never had any need to do it before either! >> >> Ball now in your court! I''m off to bed! > > That will work fine, provided that you have ''track'' on both providers.I have track set! I was pretty certain that there would be no problem! Now a can make a customer happy! Thanks once again for your help Tom! Cheers Ang -- Angela Williams angierfw at gmail dot com Linux/Networking Hacker Blog http://angierfw.wordpress.com Smile! Yeshua Loves You! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today''s security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/