The documentation recommends using the balance option where multiple providers are present. Did you have anything in mind when you made the recommendation, Tom? I would prefer all outgoing connections go through one ISP for a while. TIA ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
taso escribió:> > The documentation recommends using the balance option where multiple > providers are present. > Did you have anything in mind when you made the recommendation, Tom? > I would prefer all outgoing connections go through one ISP for a while. > > > TIA >read the documentation once again. http://www1.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html#id2460466 last example.
On Sunday 19 March 2006 03:59, taso wrote:> The documentation recommends using the balance option where multiple > providers are present. Did you have anything in mind when you made the > recommendation, Tom?Because many people can''t make it work at all without ''balance'', we recommend that people start with that setting.> I would prefer all outgoing connections go through one > ISP for a while.It''s up to you. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key