Hello,
the Shorewall documentation says in "IPSEC using Linux Kernel 2.6"
that one has to apply patches to the 2.6.x kernel to use Shorewall and
IPSEC VPN on the same box.
I did this for the 2.6.11 kernel in March last year ...
Are those patches still necessary for the 2.6.15.x kernels ?
regards
Jörg
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
Tom Eastep
2006-Feb-26 15:27 UTC
Re: is patching of kernel 2.6.15 for IPSEC still necessary ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 kermit wrote:> Hello, > > the Shorewall documentation says in "IPSEC using Linux Kernel 2.6" > that one has to apply patches to the 2.6.x kernel to use Shorewall and > IPSEC VPN on the same box. > I did this for the 2.6.11 kernel in March last year ... > Are those patches still necessary for the 2.6.15.x kernels ?Yes -- 2.6.16 will be the first kernel where patching is unnecessary. - -Tom - -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEAcjTO/MAbZfjDLIRAjSTAJ47ZIw9sNdcttN2tdX6o190hx6aVwCgywkR aTfpDRXvYdkexqtGnPdch3k=6iiU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642