Hi all, A bit of topic question, do you know if it is possible to send VRRP synning messages trough a different dedicated interface than the real interface VIP is attached? We use keepalived and dont want to flod internal network with VRRP messages. Thanks and sorry for the OT. -- Jaime Nebrera - jnebrera@eneotecnologia.com Consultor TI - ENEO Tecnologia SL Pol. PISA - C/ Manufactura 6, P1, 3B Mairena del Aljarafe - 41927 - Sevilla Telf.- 955 60 11 60 / 619 04 55 18 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
Hi, Jaime Nebrera wrote:> A bit of topic question, do you know if it is possible to send VRRP > synning messages trough a different dedicated interface than the real > interface VIP is attached? > > We use keepalived and dont want to flod internal network with VRRP > messages.Isn''t this what the lvs_sync_daemon_interface option is meant for? Bye, -- - Pieter ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
El lun, 05-12-2005 a las 10:53 +0100, Pieter Ennes escribió:> Hi, > > Jaime Nebrera wrote: > > A bit of topic question, do you know if it is possible to send VRRP > > synning messages trough a different dedicated interface than the real > > interface VIP is attached? > > > > We use keepalived and dont want to flod internal network with VRRP > > messages. > > Isn''t this what the lvs_sync_daemon_interface option is meant for?Mmmm, LVS is not the same as VRRP. The LVS dedicated interface is used to sync the state of the load balancer. VRRP interface is used to send keep alive messages between all VRRP nodes participating in the cluster. -- Jaime Nebrera - jnebrera@eneotecnologia.com Consultor TI - ENEO Tecnologia SL Pol. PISA - C/ Manufactura 6, P1, 3B Mairena del Aljarafe - 41927 - Sevilla Telf.- 955 60 11 60 / 619 04 55 18 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
Jaime Nebrera wrote:> El lun, 05-12-2005 a las 10:53 +0100, Pieter Ennes escribió: >> Hi, >> >> Jaime Nebrera wrote: >>> A bit of topic question, do you know if it is possible to send VRRP >>> synning messages trough a different dedicated interface than the real >>> interface VIP is attached? >>> >>> We use keepalived and dont want to flod internal network with VRRP >>> messages. >> Isn''t this what the lvs_sync_daemon_interface option is meant for? > > Mmmm, LVS is not the same as VRRP. The LVS dedicated interface is used > to sync the state of the load balancer. VRRP interface is used to send > keep alive messages between all VRRP nodes participating in the cluster.Ah yes, i misread, sorry... But won''t you be in trouble then, when the real interface breaks/disconnects/whatever, while the dedicated vrrp interface is still functioning correctly? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click