Mail Delivery Subsystem
2004-Mar-22 12:29 UTC
[Shorewall-users] Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:28:59 -0500 from d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <862568e4@tivoli.com> (reason: 550 5.1.1 <862568e4@tivoli.com>... User unknown) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to d03mjd01.boulder.ibm.com.:>>> DATA<<< 550 5.1.1 <862568e4@tivoli.com>... User unknown 550 5.1.1 <862568e4@tivoli.com>... User unknown <<< 503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient) -------------- next part -------------- Skipped content of type message/delivery-status-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: shorewall-users@shorewall.net Subject: Hello Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:08:00 +0100 Size: 1832 Url: http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/attachments/20040322/ddce1eee/attachment.eml
Mail Delivery Subsystem
2004-Mar-22 12:29 UTC
[Shorewall-users] Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:29:42 -0500 from d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <20000522111827.a26718@tivoli.com> (reason: 550 5.1.1 <20000522111827.a26718@tivoli.com>... User unknown) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to d03mjd01.boulder.ibm.com.:>>> DATA<<< 550 5.1.1 <20000522111827.a26718@tivoli.com>... User unknown 550 5.1.1 <20000522111827.a26718@tivoli.com>... User unknown <<< 503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient) -------------- next part -------------- Skipped content of type message/delivery-status-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: shorewall-users@shorewall.net Subject: Mail Delivery (failure 20000522111827.a26718@tivoli.com) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:08:39 +0100 Size: 2108 Url: http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/attachments/20040322/54dddbb5/attachment.eml
This message had a virus attached to it. Please check yur system to see if it is still sending out the virus with your messages. Aubrey At 03:29 PM 3/22/2004 -0500, you wrote:>The original message was received at Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:28:59 -0500 >from d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217] > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ><862568e4@tivoli.com> > (reason: 550 5.1.1 <862568e4@tivoli.com>... User unknown) > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- >... while talking to d03mjd01.boulder.ibm.com.: >>>> DATA ><<< 550 5.1.1 <862568e4@tivoli.com>... User unknown >550 5.1.1 <862568e4@tivoli.com>... User unknown ><<< 503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient) >Reporting-MTA: dns; northrelay01.pok.ibm.com >Received-From-MTA: DNS; d01av03.pok.ibm.com >Arrival-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:28:59 -0500 > >Final-Recipient: RFC822; 862568e4@tivoli.com >Action: failed >Status: 5.1.1 >Remote-MTA: DNS; d03mjd01.boulder.ibm.com >Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 <862568e4@tivoli.com>... User unknown >Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:29:01 -0500 >Return-Path: <shorewall-users@shorewall.net> >Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) > by northrelay01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id > i2MKSwDv080188 > for <862568e4@tivoli.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:28:59 -0500 >Received: from tivoli.com ([212.20.74.206]) > by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/NS PXFA) with ESMTP id i2MKS43a485946 > for <862568e4@tivoli.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:28:26 -0500 >Message-Id: <200403222028.i2MKS43a485946@e1.ny.us.ibm.com> >From: shorewall-users@shorewall.net >To: 862568e4@tivoli.com >Subject: Hello >Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:08:00 +0100 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016" >X-Priority: 3 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > >Try this game ;-) > > > >application.txt.pif is removed from here because it contains a virus.> >Found virus WORM_NETSKY.P in file application.txt.pif>The file is deleted. > >IBM''s antivirus detection system has identified a virus in an attachmentto this e-mail. The attachment has been deleted. No further reporting or action is required on your part. THIS EMAIL IS NOW SAFE TO OPEN. Visit w3.ibm.com/virus for more information.> >_______________________________________________ >Shorewall-users mailing list >Post: Shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net >Subscribe/Unsubscribe:https://lists.shorewall.net/mailman/listinfo/shorewall-users>Support: http://www.shorewall.net/support.htm >FAQ: http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm
Aubrey Kilpatrick wrote:> This message had a virus attached to it. Please check your system to see if > it is still sending out the virus with your messages. >>> >>Final-Recipient: RFC822; 862568e4@tivoli.com >>Action: failed >>Status: 5.1.1 >>Remote-MTA: DNS; d03mjd01.boulder.ibm.com >>Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 <862568e4@tivoli.com>... User unknown >>Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:29:01 -0500 >>Return-Path: <shorewall-users@shorewall.net> >>Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) >> by northrelay01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id >> i2MKSwDv080188 >> for <862568e4@tivoli.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:28:59 -0500 >>Received: from tivoli.com ([212.20.74.206]) >> by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/NS PXFA) with ESMTP id i2MKS43a485946 >> for <862568e4@tivoli.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:28:26 -0500 >>Message-Id: <200403222028.i2MKS43a485946@e1.ny.us.ibm.com> >>From: shorewall-users@shorewall.netAs you can see above, this message appears to have originated from a system masquerading as tivoli.com (212.20.74.206); it has a bogus From: address (and I suspect that the envelope sender was forged as well). There is a difference of opinion about the name of the IBM system which may indicate that the lower received header is also forged. What is most important to notice is that shorewall.net is nowhere in the original send headers.>>To: 862568e4@tivoli.com >>Subject: Hello >>Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:08:00 +0100 >>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>Content-Type: multipart/mixed; >> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016" >>X-Priority: 3 >>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >> >>Try this game ;-) > FAQ: http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htmWhat ended up getting posted on the mailing list was the bounce notification, not the virus itself. I get dozens of these a day (in addition to the 100s I get from bounced Italian spam sent to Russia!!!) and most of them are dropped here at my server; looks like one sneaked through. With so many viruses forging sender addresses, it is criminal for mail admins to continue to configure their AV software to send DSNs like this. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
Thanks Tom, I knew you would be ableto explain it too me. Just want to make sure I''m not one of the systems that causes the problem. I am going to send a copy of this to my ISP for their information and records also. Thanks, aubrey At 02:28 PM 3/22/04 -0800, you wrote:>Aubrey Kilpatrick wrote: >> This message had a virus attached to it. Please check your system tosee if>> it is still sending out the virus with your messages. >> > >>> >>>Final-Recipient: RFC822; 862568e4@tivoli.com >>>Action: failed >>>Status: 5.1.1 >>>Remote-MTA: DNS; d03mjd01.boulder.ibm.com >>>Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 5.1.1 <862568e4@tivoli.com>... User unknown >>>Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:29:01 -0500 >>>Return-Path: <shorewall-users@shorewall.net> >>>Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) >>> by northrelay01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id >>> i2MKSwDv080188 >>> for <862568e4@tivoli.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:28:59 -0500 >>>Received: from tivoli.com ([212.20.74.206]) >>> by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/NS PXFA) with ESMTP id i2MKS43a485946 >>> for <862568e4@tivoli.com>; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:28:26 -0500 >>>Message-Id: <200403222028.i2MKS43a485946@e1.ny.us.ibm.com> >>>From: shorewall-users@shorewall.net > >As you can see above, this message appears to have originated from a >system masquerading as tivoli.com (212.20.74.206); it has a bogus From: >address (and I suspect that the envelope sender was forged as well). >There is a difference of opinion about the name of the IBM system which >may indicate that the lower received header is also forged. > >What is most important to notice is that shorewall.net is nowhere in the >original send headers. > >>>To: 862568e4@tivoli.com >>>Subject: Hello >>>Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:08:00 +0100 >>>MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>Content-Type: multipart/mixed; >>> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016" >>>X-Priority: 3 >>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >>> >>>Try this game ;-) >> FAQ: http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm > >What ended up getting posted on the mailing list was the bounce >notification, not the virus itself. I get dozens of these a day (in >addition to the 100s I get from bounced Italian spam sent to Russia!!!) >and most of them are dropped here at my server; looks like one sneaked >through. With so many viruses forging sender addresses, it is criminal >for mail admins to continue to configure their AV software to send DSNs >like this. > >-Tom >-- >Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool >Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net >Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net > > >_______________________________________________ >Shorewall-users mailing list >Post: Shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net >Subscribe/Unsubscribe:https://lists.shorewall.net/mailman/listinfo/shorewall-users>Support: http://www.shorewall.net/support.htm >FAQ: http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm >