Shorewall users - Mar 2004 - Re: Re: [Shorewall-newbies] Shorewall 2.0.0

Sorry Tom, This mail was right before the last one but the subject was obscured.

I have looked at the sample configs, both then and after seeing this mail. There
is no single use of any of the action statements.

I had learnt earlier today from the website that it is more efficient to use the
standard syntax in the rules files.

Ama
> On Monday 15 March 2004 01:32 am, Ama Kalu wrote:
> > Tom, Francesca;
> >
> > How maay I access the sample configurations, it may just answer a post
I
> > sent last week that no one has responded to.
> >
> >
> 
> http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Samples
> 
> -Tom
> -- 
> Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
> Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
> Washington USA  \ teastep@shorewall.net
> 
>

On Monday 15 March 2004 07:55 am, Ama Kalu wrote:
> I have looked at the sample configs, both then and after seeing this mail.
> There is no single use of any of the action statements.
Yes.
>
> I had learnt earlier today from the website that it is more efficient to
> use the standard syntax in the rules files.
>
That is true.

The errata (http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/errata) now has updated 
firewall scripts for both 1.4.10 and 2.0.0

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ teastep@shorewall.net