Tom Eastep
2003-Feb-06 20:50 UTC
[Shorewall-users] Re: More non-routable subnets (quasi-RFC 1918)
mike808@users.sourceforge.net wrote:> I found some additional non-routable subnets that are not in that automated list > in the stock rfc1918 file. Some folks may want to add them. > > They''re there, apparently, because ICANN has reserved them, not because they''re > in RFC1918. Tom, feel free to add these in. > > >># Additional information from: ross@willow.seitz.com >># Filtering test IP ranges Ross Vandegrift linux@lug.udel.edu >># From https://www.lug.udel.edu/pipermail/linux/2002-May/003010.html >>1.0.0.0/8 logdrop # ReservedAlready included in my entry "0.0.0.0/7">>69.0.0.0/8 logdrop # ReservedThat was recently allocated to ARIN!!>>71.0.0.0/8 logdrop # ReservedAlready included in my entry "70.0.0.0/7">>114.0.0.0/5 logdrop # ReservedAlready included in my entry "96.0.0.0/3">>122.0.0.0/6 logdrop # ReservedAlready included in my entry "96.0.0.0/3">>128.0.0.0/16 logdrop # ReservedAccording to http://www.iana.net/assignments/ipv4-address-space, this is assigned to "Various Registries">>201.0.0.0/8 logdrop # ReservedThis is reserved for Central and South America -- should probably be in my list but ???>>221.0.0.0/8 logdrop # ReservedAccording to http://www.iana.net/assignments/ipv4-address-space, this is assigned to APINC.>>223.0.0.0/8 logdrop # ReservedThis appears to be missing in my list -- thanks.>>224.0.0.0/4 logdrop # Reserved''norfc1918'' will NOT block multicast. Thanks, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
Tom Eastep
2003-Feb-06 21:00 UTC
[Shorewall-users] Re: More non-routable subnets (quasi-RFC 1918)
Tom Eastep wrote:> >>> 223.0.0.0/8 logdrop # Reserved >> > > This appears to be missing in my list -- thanks. >Oops -- my bad. This is included in my entry "222.0.0.0/7" -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net