Rule "REJECT local:~00-30-4F-1B-9D-D0 net tcp 1000:7000" added. iptables v1.2.5: interface name `~00-30-4F-1B-9D-D0'' must be shorter than IFNAMSIZ (15) Try `iptables -h'' or ''iptables --help'' for more information. why such strange information after `shorewall restart` ??
--On Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:48:46 PM +0100 Maciek Kurkiewicz <mkurkiewicz@wi.ps.pl> wrote:> > Rule "REJECT local:~00-30-4F-1B-9D-D0 net tcp 1000:7000" added. > > iptables v1.2.5: interface name `~00-30-4F-1B-9D-D0'' must be shorter than > IFNAMSIZ (15) > Try `iptables -h'' or ''iptables --help'' for more information. > > > why such strange information after `shorewall restart` ??No idea -- Added that rule on my test system and saw no such noise. Please "shorewall debug start 2> /tmp/trace" and send me the /tmp/trace file. Thanks, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.sf.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
--On Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:05:53 PM +0100 Maciek Kurkiewicz <maciek@alpha.net.pl> wrote:>> >> Rule "REJECT local:~00-30-4F-1B-9D-D0 net tcp 1000:7000" added. >> >> iptables v1.2.5: interface name `~00-30-4F-1B-9D-D0'' must be shorter than >> IFNAMSIZ (15) >> Try `iptables -h'' or ''iptables --help'' for more information. >> >> >> why such strange information after `shorewall restart` ?? > > > it is that file, please help me :) > shorewall version - 1.3.7 >The rule that is in error is the next one: REJECT net local:~00-30-4F-1B-9D-D0 tcp 1000:7000 MAC addresses can not be used in the destination portion of a rule. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.sf.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net