Secure testing team - Feb 2009 - gnumeric for i386 not migrated to security.debian.org

The i386 compile of gnumeric 1.8.3-5+lenny1 has not reached
security.debian.org, whereas the other architectures have.  Any ideas
why?

   Julian

Hi Julian!

Julian Gilbey wrote:
> The i386 compile of gnumeric 1.8.3-5+lenny1 has not reached
> security.debian.org, whereas the other architectures have.  Any ideas
> why?
It has not been built for security by any buildd linked to security.

Why that... I don''t know, though.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Of course, I didn''t mean that, which is why I didn''t say it.
What I meant to say, I said.              -- Thomas Bushnell

On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:13:54PM +0100, Martin Schulze
wrote:
> Hi Julian!
> 
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > The i386 compile of gnumeric 1.8.3-5+lenny1 has not reached
> > security.debian.org, whereas the other architectures have.  Any ideas
> > why?
> 
> It has not been built for security by any buildd linked to security.
> 
> Why that... I don''t know, though.
Hi Joey!

Thanks for the partial explanation.

Is there an i386 buildd linked to security?  Did gnumeric get added to
the wanna-build list for i386?

   Julian

Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:13:54PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Hi Julian!
> > 
> > Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > The i386 compile of gnumeric 1.8.3-5+lenny1 has not reached
> > > security.debian.org, whereas the other architectures have.  Any
ideas
> > > why?
> > 
> > It has not been built for security by any buildd linked to security.
> > 
> > Why that... I don''t know, though.
> 
> Hi Joey!
> 
> Thanks for the partial explanation.
> 
> Is there an i386 buildd linked to security?  Did gnumeric get added to
> the wanna-build list for i386?
There is an i386 buildd for security, of course.  I guess it is not
online at the moment.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book

Hi,
* Martin Schulze <joey at infodrom.org> [2009-02-09
11:21]:
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:13:54PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Hi Julian!
> > > 
> > > Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > > The i386 compile of gnumeric 1.8.3-5+lenny1 has not reached
> > > > security.debian.org, whereas the other architectures have. 
Any ideas
> > > > why?
[...] 
> There is an i386 buildd for security, of course.  I guess it is not
> online at the moment.
The build failed in the first place because of a buildd 
problem. I contacted the i386 buildd team right after seeing 
this and I guess someone is working on that (I got no reply 
so far). Please be patient.

Cheers
Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion at jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/secure-testing-team/attachments/20090209/6f58c392/attachment.pgp

Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Martin Schulze <joey at infodrom.org> [2009-02-09 11:21]:
> > Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:13:54PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > > Hi Julian!
> > > > 
> > > > Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > > > The i386 compile of gnumeric 1.8.3-5+lenny1 has not
reached
> > > > > security.debian.org, whereas the other architectures
have.  Any ideas
> > > > > why?
> [...] 
> > There is an i386 buildd for security, of course.  I guess it is not
> > online at the moment.
> 
> The build failed in the first place because of a buildd 
> problem. I contacted the i386 buildd team right after seeing 
> this and I guess someone is working on that (I got no reply 
> so far). Please be patient.
Good news, thanks.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
No question is too silly to ask, but, of course, some are too silly
to answer.   -- Perl book

Hi,
* Martin Schulze <joey at infodrom.org> [2009-02-09
14:07]:
> Nico Golde wrote:
> > * Martin Schulze <joey at infodrom.org> [2009-02-09 11:21]:
> > > Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > [...] 
> > > There is an i386 buildd for security, of course.  I guess it is
not
> > > online at the moment.
> > 
> > The build failed in the first place because of a buildd 
> > problem. I contacted the i386 buildd team right after seeing 
> > this and I guess someone is working on that (I got no reply 
> > so far). Please be patient.
> 
> Good news, thanks.
Problem fixed.

http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/g/gnumeric/gnumeric_1.8.3-5+lenny1_i386.deb
http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/g/gnumeric/gnumeric-plugins-extra_1.8.3-5+lenny1_i386.deb

Cheers
Nico

-- 
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion at jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/secure-testing-team/attachments/20090209/fdfc4895/attachment.pgp