search for: zytek

Priorityjumping is totally ignored by my asterisk (tested 1.4.4 and 1.4.7.1 on FreeBSD 6.2) [general] priorityjumping=yes With n+101: exten => 1337,1,Dial(SIP/zytek,5,Ttj) exten => 1337,102,Dial(SIP/zytek,${RINGTIME},${OPTIONS}) exten => 1337,n,Hangup -- Executing [1337 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/113-087a3000", "SIP/zytek|5|Ttj") in new stack -- Called zytek -- SIP/zytek-087b9000 is ringing -- Nobody picked up in 5000 ms...

...silence when waiting for call answer. Music on hold stops when transferer pics a number and client doesn't even hear ringing. Is this normal behaviour? How to change this? Log says everything, MOH should stop after call pickup, not before Dial. -- Executing [113 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/zytek-08737000", "SIP/113|180|Tt") in new stack -- Called 113 -- SIP/113-08758000 is ringing -- SIP/113-08758000 answered SIP/zytek-08737000 -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on channel 'SIP/zytek-08737000' -- <SIP/113-08758000> Playing 'pbx-transfer'...

...rs music on hold (only on voip line as said in previous post), when I get back and press Flash again to get back to my client I cannon hear him, but he hears me without problems. I have just tested in on the LAN, same situations, happens everytime. -- Executing [113 at firma:1] Dial("SIP/zytek-087a2000", "SIP/113|720|Ttm") in new stack -- Called 113 -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on channel 'SIP/zytek-087a2000' -- SIP/113-087a7000 is ringing -- SIP/113-087a7000 answered SIP/zytek-087a2000 -- Stopped music on hold on SIP/zytek-087a200...

...RK on other hosts... but not on this one. he uses flashget or some p2p tool, iptraf shows about 300 connections and the numver increases slowly. now im am trying hardener-r5 kernel and then i will try htb.init with MARK, maybe this will help. and i can recompile iproute2. -- .: Jakub Głazik (zytek) .: email:zytek@ostrow-wlkp.net .: JID:zytek@azazel.ostrow-wlkp.net .: http://www.misiaj.sie.pl [obsolete] _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Dear all, I know this is not imq mailing list. But many of the users over here have done exactly what i want. Requirement:- I want to tight bound eth1 for 100 kbps but after i want to create many classes of 64 kbps or 50 kbps and others. But the total sum of classes is more than 100 kbps so my eth1 is not restrciting total bandwidth at 100kbps. According to search on google imq is the solution.

...erstand me.. I just wonder if when I make a class with RULE=something will this be shaped to it''s RATE or will kernel search for child classes to find out extra parameters matching a connection (like RULE=client_ip) And sorry for my lack of english knowledge ;) -- .: Jakub Głazik (zytek) .: email: zytek@ostrow-wlkp.net .: JID: zytek@azazel.ostrow-wlkp.net .: http://www.misiaj.sie.pl [obsolete] _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

I was trying to install iproute2-2.2.4. I get an error when i run the makefile. I get a parse error in /usr/include/arpa/inet.h. Can someone help me? Thanks. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...parent and then 64Kbit for each shaped host, and rest (with fairness) to other hosts in the subnet? or the traffic would be shaped to 500Kbit and will never run thru child classes? I would be thankful for any answer that would allow me to understand tc philosophy better ;) -- .: Jakub Głazik (zytek) .: email: zytek@ostrow-wlkp.net .: JID: zytek@azazel.ostrow-wlkp.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello everybody. i have the folowing problem: i have this in the top of PREROUTING chain in mangle table iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0 # rule 1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 5 # rule 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 6 # rule 3 i think when packet is passing trough my POSTROUTING in mangle table

Hi folks. Let''s say I would like to make some bandwidth control on my network using HTB. I have 2 clients: PC1: 192.168.100.2 PC2: 192.168.100.3 Server: 192.168.100.1 This has 2 NIC''s eth1 is local and eth2 is connected to the internet. It could be nice to have a script, where you could specify, how much bandwidth you want for a specific host on a network, like, PC1 has

Hi All, Does anyone know of a way to limit the speed of *individual* TCP sessions, but without placing any overall bandwidth limits, and without requiring an explicit QoS entry for every ip address the machine is communicating with ? The scenario is a mailserver - say you want to limit individual TCP sessions (pop3, smtp etc) to no more than 512Kbit so that an individual session

...Asterisk. I have red about blind and atxfer and I believe this is what I want: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8413 is this already in Asterisk 1.4.4 ? How can I make it the default behaviour when Flash is pressed? Or maybe I need something else? -- .: Jakub G?azik, .: email & jabber: zytek<at>nuxi.pl

asterisk-1.4.7, Fedora 7, intel emt64 - nocona: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/alsa.conf': Found ALSA lib pcm_dsnoop.c:558:(snd_pcm_dsnoop_open) unable to open slave [Jul 15 10:12:23] ERROR[24420]: chan_alsa.c:365 alsa_card_init: snd_pcm_open failed: No such file or directory [Jul 15 10:12:23] ERROR[24420]: chan_alsa.c:481 soundcard_init: Problem opening alsa I/O devices == No sound

Hi, I've recently upgraded Asterisk to the latest version 1.4.9 on a PBX that manages several queues, but at least on one queue strategy (leastrecent) it doesn't seem to be distributing the calls has it should. I think this strategy should work like this: a) Make a list of available agents and their idle time (time since last call) and

Hi, All, I have a question about agents and queues. Right now we have about 4 queues in our system. Some agents are in multiple queues. Our main queue is for technical support and it's by far our busiest queue as well. We have the autologoff feature set to 14 sec right now in the agents.conf file. The problem I'm running into is we don't want people in our sales queue (who are