search for: zvn

...pared: 1550 * Result for [SCHEMA]: SUCCESS * Comparing [DNSDOMAIN] context... * Objects to be compared: 196 * Result for [DNSDOMAIN]: SUCCESS * Comparing [DNSFOREST] context... * Objects to be compared: 19 * Result for [DNSFOREST]: SUCCESS > > 2016-06-27 15:21 GMT+02:00 Zhuchenko Valery <zvn at belkam.com>: > >> Hi all! >> >> Today, after two years of production, I get this error: >> >> samba-tool user create test20160627 testpassword >> >> ERROR(ldb): Failed to add user 'test20160627': - >> ../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:...

Hi all! Today, after two years of production, I get this error: samba-tool user create test20160627 testpassword ERROR(ldb): Failed to add user 'test20160627': - ../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1216: Failed to re-index objectSid in CN=test20160627,CN=Users,DC=ad... - ../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1148: unique index violation on objectSid in CN=test20160627,CN=Users,DC=ad... Help me

...on: change tombstoneLifetime which is by default 180 days to only 1 day. Doing that tomorrow all deleted objects will be deleted and if you are lucky - I can't guaranty that will work - you will able to reuse these RIDs. Hoping this helps... M. 2016-06-28 13:05 GMT+02:00 Zhuchenko Valery <zvn at belkam.com>: > I'm understand, why I get error about unique index violation on objectSid: > > samba-tool fsmo show > RidAllocationMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS > > Settings,CN=PDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,... > > Last creat...

2016-06-28 14:22 GMT+02:00 valera <valera at zvn.p98.belkam.com>: > 28.06.2016 15:50, mathias dufresne: > > Here I'm thinking of two workarounds. The first one would be to list > > deleted objects RIDs, to verify RID=2002 is really the last one used, > > being sure there is no deleted object with RID=2003 and so on. T...

...> * Comparing [DNSDOMAIN] context... > * Objects to be compared: 196 > * Result for [DNSDOMAIN]: SUCCESS > * Comparing [DNSFOREST] context... > * Objects to be compared: 19 > * Result for [DNSFOREST]: SUCCESS > >> >> 2016-06-27 15:21 GMT+02:00 Zhuchenko Valery <zvn at belkam.com>: >> >>> Hi all! >>> >>> Today, after two years of production, I get this error: >>> >>> samba-tool user create test20160627 testpassword >>> >>> ERROR(ldb): Failed to add user 'test20160627': - >>&...

I love diving : ) 2016-06-28 16:44 GMT+02:00 mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com>: > > > 2016-06-28 14:22 GMT+02:00 valera <valera at zvn.p98.belkam.com>: > >> 28.06.2016 15:50, mathias dufresne: >> > Here I'm thinking of two workarounds. The first one would be to list >> > deleted objects RIDs, to verify RID=2002 is really the last one used, >> > being sure there is no deleted object with R...

Hi David, That's weird, I have setup LNT in multiple different distros and have never seen this. Looks like no one ever tested on the system you're running. Can you share a bit more of your environment? Also, you can check the setup.py to see if it does any stripping of package names, which could go wrong in the wrong environment. cheers, --renato On 29 January 2015 at 20:13, David

I followed the lnt quickstart <http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html> directions but got this diagnostic when doing the setup: bash-3.2$ ~/mysandbox/bin/python ~/lnt/setup.py develop /Users/dcallahan/mysandbox/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py:284: UserWarning: The version spec\ ified requires normalization, consider using '0.4.1.dev0' instead of

...[DNSDOMAIN] context... >> * Objects to be compared: 196 >> * Result for [DNSDOMAIN]: SUCCESS >> * Comparing [DNSFOREST] context... >> * Objects to be compared: 19 >> * Result for [DNSFOREST]: SUCCESS >> >>> 2016-06-27 15:21 GMT+02:00 Zhuchenko Valery <zvn at belkam.com>: >>> >>>> Hi all! >>>> >>>> Today, after two years of production, I get this error: >>>> >>>> samba-tool user create test20160627 testpassword >>>> >>>> ERROR(ldb): Failed to add user '...

...`!Rxeql1!jDd|^Qel2(t)sp|D`{q^jp35qF&t(<8=dz04b9qHOK?77;nzY}{{+hK? z#58p2C{@>00yXfFk9inU1_q)~CND}(M>%!+pz^{X=`|r;K9HtKv&7p9X}z>rys-nK zQhx#I{kazST>JhevK!K=&wtTU2RZFy`zL8H_8`g}HciE-I;{oIXeDRRvrkiFCBi3E zcck^@#WvC6G*OqIzAis*K%Ywkdb<I1^%$omGukf%?Xo%==VCiZoYQs?x^qlK7pJ3_ zr=zVn#|Woxb3zN85No%Gxu)_)pJvQDx6x84CYVc0V>hnVzCTLU(3KFj6wLFBn;&j- z7d at ru8)9=7t at +-j*u<Ze#k#Na(vPMX+5E_7?~b4kQPO&yiN^D3M_NE=L*RHUNNE<F zTE47aAC#}X at n-57qotYBT+v75MVNQ4V2d#;-Nue^cPEBj``#)war{F&F^-CaKmNXi z4!?G4=i^cm#{`MHpbeZv-$19ZtL_p?qQa7*wvu#LZ2g at ipNp<}6KL4|D_vD~ZuTf>...

Hi, all! I have samba 4 AD (4.1.22) and try to create new domain in existing forest with controller on windows 2008 r2. It is possible? 1. At dcpromo, after all needed containers replications, I get error: Active Directory Domain Services could not create the object CN=CHDOM,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=... Log from samba: [...]

Dear samba list, I have working Samba4 AD domain controller (4.1.22). Windows server 2008 R2 have dcpromo option "Existing forest / Create a new domain in existing forest". It is possible to do it? Best regards, Valery.

Hi, all Tell me, please, how to establish outgoing REALM trust with Samba4 from Windows? It is possible? On Samba4 side I have created user with name fqdn-of-windows-host and password fqdn-of-windows-host-password and then samba-tool spn add host/fqdn-of-windows-host fqdn-of-windows-host On Windows side I have executed: ksetup /addkdc SAMBA-REALM samba-fqdn What to do then? netdom trust

Hi, all! There is no check of NS records in this document https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_and_Creating_a_DC_DNS_Record For example, with two DCs at myzone $ host -t NS myzone dc1 (or dc2, or myzone) must return two records: myzone name server dc1.myzone. myzone name server dc2.myzone. $ host -t NS _msdcs.myzone dc1 (or dc2, or myzone) must return two records: _msdcs.myzone name

I speak about working controller, not about powered off, but network segment doesn't available to other controllers, for pdc emulator, and controller is available for workstations at this network segment. 14.04.2020 13:00, L.P.H. van Belle via samba ?????: > Why would you have a server (DC) that long powered off, it for sure will give delays and less response of the network. > But you

I think, the reason is some files acls, which contain uid or gid, absent in the domain. How to make so that winbindd in this case every time didn't connect with controller, but only periodically update data, using parameters winbind cache time and idmap negative cache time? I think so because in logs I see these strings: ...host has no idea of uid ... ...Connected to LDAP server...

Hi, all. What is greatest period for AD DC (non FSMO) can be unavailable, for example, because network segment is unavailable for long time (3, 4 weeks)? Is the controller will be removed from AD automatically? And what to do after this network segment will become available? I have read about tombstoneLifeTime attribute of Directory Service (Configuration, Services, Windows NT), which default

Hi, all! When I launch (again and again) smbcacls "//myfileserver/share" "" -U user -W domain or smbclient "//myfileserver/share" -U user -W domain -c "ls", in tcpdump output at myfileserver I see multiple calls to controller via ldap, therefore these commands are executed slowly. When I run getent groups at myfileserver, all worked fine, and tcpdump