search for: ztvf

...ge directory '/u1/scratch/R-1.9.0/tests/Packages/VR/spatial' has no valid DESCRIPTION file Execution halted See the information on DESCRIPTION files in section 'Creating R packages' of the 'Writing R Extensions' manual. Has anyone seen the same, or is it just me? [With tar ztvf src/library/Recommended/VR.tgz, I do see DESCRIPTION.in in the packages, but no DESCRIPTION.] Best, Andy Andy Liaw, PhD Biometrics Research PO Box 2000, RY33-300 Merck Research Labs Rahway, NJ 07065 mailto:andy_liaw@merck.com 732-594-0820

...* cleaning src * installing the package to re-build vignettes * creating vignettes ... OK * cleaning src * checking for LF line-endings in source and make files * checking for empty or unneeded directories * building 'BUS_1.5.0.tar.gz' D:\biocbld\bbs-2.7-bioc>tar ztvf BUS_1.5.0.tar.gz --wildcards '*.o' -rwxr--r-- biocbuild2/root 16503 2010-10-10 22:15 BUS/src/BUS.o Packages with a Makefile in src/ don't seem to be affected. This is with R 2.12.0 RC (2010-10-07 r53227). Thanks, H. -- Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Pu...

...ot; does anything stupid, and if I reproduce the options it seems to be using, I still get similar reductions in size. I tried a few other autotools generated tarballs (including xapian-omega and xapian-bindings snapshots) and otherwise I seem to get a very similar size tarball. If I do "tar ztvf" on each and diff, 3 files appear at different places in the two lists, all files in apidoc/html. So I guess that must be why one compresses so much better, but it seems rather an extreme difference. I'm guessed it might be the "dist_hook" rule which puts these files in that ca...

Full_Name: Jarno Tuimala Version: 2.3.1 OS: Solaris / Linux Submission from: (NULL) (193.166.2.98) Today I downloaded the latest source code release R-2.3.1.tar.gz, and it seems not to contain the VR bundle. After running ./configure I get the following error message: checking for recommended packages... ./src/library/Recommended/VR_*.tar.gz: No such file or directory no configure: error: Some

...in sprintf("%011o", as.integer(size)) : NAs introduced by coercion probably because 'size' was > .Machine$integer.max for one of the files included in the tarball. This suggests that the resulting tarball might be incorrect. Which is confirmed later when running 'tar ztvf' on that tarball from the Unix comand line: -rw-r--r-- biocbuild/phs_compbio 38 2012-12-11 09:37 ChIPXpressData/.BBSoptions -rw-r--r-- biocbuild/phs_compbio 442 2013-01-18 12:04 ChIPXpressData/DESCRIPTION -rw-r--r-- biocbuild/phs_compbio 0 2012-12-11 09:37 ChIPXpressData/NAMESPAC...

Dear developers, Upon CRAN submission I have bumped into "future file timestamps" warning that I can't solve. I have updated the package as usual, and all checks go through in my system. CRAN reports the following warning however. * checking for future file timestanps ... WARNING Files with future time stamps: DESCRIPTION NAMESPACE README.md The build log is at

I'm having trouble un 'tar'ing the file ctest_0_9-3_tar.tar. When using the command "tar -xv" on a UNIX machine I get the "checksum error" message. When trying to use WinZip on a Win95 machine it gives an error reading the header. I'm downloading from the CRAN site at Carnegie Mellon. Could the file there be corrupted? Thanks for any help, and sorry if

I'm having trouble un 'tar'ing the file ctest_0_9-3_tar.tar. When using the command "tar -xv" on a UNIX machine I get the "checksum error" message. When trying to use WinZip on a Win95 machine it gives an error reading the header. I'm downloading from the CRAN site at Carnegie Mellon. Could the file there be corrupted? Thanks for any help, and sorry if

...t how to use the original ZIP archive from the vendor ftp://ftp.areca.com.tw/RaidCards/AP_Drivers/Linux/DRIVER/CentOS/CentOS-5.0/1.20.0X.13/arcmsr.redhat.1.20.0x.13.zip in the spec, but instead cheated and created a .tgz archive from it to stay closer to the r1000 spec file's approach: $ tar ztvf arcmsr.redhat.1.20.0x.13.tgz drwxrwxr-x prs/prs 0 2006-12-22 17:52:50 arcmsr.redhat.1.20.0x.13/ drwxrwxr-x prs/prs 0 2006-12-22 17:52:50 arcmsr.redhat.1.20.0x.13/arcmsr/ -rw-rw-r-- prs/prs 96956 2006-11-08 16:59:50 arcmsr.redhat.1.20.0x.13/arcmsr/arcmsr.c -rw-rw-r-- prs/p...

...how to solve this. Perhaps we would need to generate the > > files in a certain order but not sure what is the correct order. > > > > Any tips? > > What are the time stamps on those files? You can list the contents of > the tarball at the command line using > > tar ztvf wCorr_1.9.0.tar.gz > > Are the timestamps correct? > > Duncan Murdoch > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...to generate the > > > files in a certain order but not sure what is the correct order. > > > > > > Any tips? > > > > What are the time stamps on those files? You can list the contents of > > the tarball at the command line using > > > > tar ztvf wCorr_1.9.0.tar.gz > > > > Are the timestamps correct? > > > > Duncan Murdoch > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailma...