search for: zroot

...have raid1 on zfs with 2 device on pool first device died and boot from second not working... i try to get http://mfsbsd.vx.sk/ flash and load from it with zpool import http://puu.sh/2402E when i load zfs.ko and opensolaris.ko i see this message: Solaris: WARNING: Can''t open objset for zroot/var/crash Solaris: WARNING: Can''t open objset for zroot/var/crash zpool status: http://puu.sh/2405f resilvering freeze with: zpool status -v ............. zroot/usr:<0x28ff> zroot/usr:<0x29ff> zroot/usr:<0x2aff> zroot/var/crash:&l...

...ystem version 4 ZFS storage pool version 15 Yesterday my comp with Freebsd 8.2 releng shutdown with ad4 error detached,when I copy a big file... and after reboot in 2 wd green 1tb say me goodbye. One of them die and other with zfs errors: Apr 24 04:53:41 Flash root: ZFS: vdev I/O failure, zpool=zroot path= offset=187921768448 size=512 error=6 Apr 24 04:53:41 Flash root: ZFS: vdev I/O failure, zpool=zroot path= offset=187921768960 size=512 error=6 Apr 24 04:53:41 Flash root: ZFS: vdev I/O failure, zpool=zroot path= offset=311738368 size=21504 error=6 Apr 24 04:53:41 Flash root: ZFS: zpool I/O fa...

...l' When I checked with ls /boot/kernel/, the directory does exist. :-( Since the system has encrypted root partion with ZFSonROOT, I tried to follow instructions at https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?&t=8958 to boot with a livecd and went to the shell prompt and tried to import the zroot pool with 'zpool import -f zroot' but it says no such pool is available. How to fix it? Any hint? Thanks!

...whew), but zpool status -v still shows errors.. Will this self correct when we replace the degraded disk and resilver? Or is there something else that I''m not finding that I need to do to clean up? This is Solaris 10 u8, zpool v15 15:52:50 catalina(34)> sudo zpool status -v pool: zroot state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the entire pool from backup. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-8A scrub...

...t count per user*IP to 20 as TB seems to be parallel downloading a lot of folders. This has neither improved nor degraded performance in any way I can see and is probably irrelevant. Any hints greatly appreciated. Filesystem/Zpool data: NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE zroot size 400G - zroot capacity 28% - zroot altroot - default zroot health ONLINE - zroot guid 1061309925223582150 default zroot version...

...ode 1 Stop. make[2]: stopped in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/src *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/src root at els1:/usr/src # ll /boot lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 13 Oct 26 14:33 /boot@ -> bootpool/boot root at els1:/usr/src # mount zroot/bootenv/default on / (zfs, local, noatime, nfsv4acls) devfs on /dev (devfs, local, multilabel) zroot/tmp on /tmp (zfs, local, noatime, nosuid, nfsv4acls) zroot/usr/home on /usr/home (zfs, local, noatime, nosuid, nfsv4acls) zroot/usr/local on /usr/local (zfs, local, noatime, nfsv4acls) zroot/usr/obj...

...uld seem like a lot of anything to be logged. > > These really shouldn't be happening.. > One possibility is that there is a scrub/verify routine running that is checking the actual size vs. reported size of messages, and perhaps that routine doesn't know about ZFS compression: zroot/ezjail used 117G - zroot/ezjail compressratio 1.25x - zroot/ezjail compression lz4 local zroot/ezjail logicalused 137G - and is seeing something anom...

I had a sparc64 (Netra X1) running a stable/9 from late March 2013. Actually, the kernel may've been a bit newer than that as I was working with folks to diagnose and repair some Netra-X1 specific issues. But, ZFS worked fine. I have two pools, zroot as a RAID1 (using equally sized partitions at the front of two large disks), and a zdata that is a large pool of the remaining space of both disks concatenated together. After installing a kernel from a build of [yesterday's] stable/9 today, I now get a failure when trying to boot, which can...

I have samba 4.3 running on FreeBSD 10.2 on ZFS and I am unable to create new GPOs, getting "invalid Parameter" response.Log files indicate ACL issues. Domain was provisioned with --use-ntvfs option.Filesystem is mounted with this options:zroot/ROOT/default on / (zfs, local, noatime, nfsv4acls) acl options on zfs are this:zroot/ROOT/default aclmode passthrough inherited from zrootzroot/ROOT/default aclinherit passthrough inherited from zroot samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck returns errors: ERROR(<type 'exceptions.TypeError'...

...ing a new UID (old uid=306803, file=1428785463.M645546P27215.host,S=5389,W=5442:2,S) > > One possibility is that there is a scrub/verify routine running that is checking the actual size vs. reported size of messages, and perhaps that routine doesn't know about ZFS compression: > > zroot/ezjail used 117G - > zroot/ezjail compressratio 1.25x - > zroot/ezjail compression lz4 local > zroot/ezjail logicalused 137G - > > and...

..., no uncorrectable errors reported. # zpool status pool: bootpool state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM bootpool ONLINE 0 0 0 aacd0s1a ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors pool: zroot state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 aacd0s1d.eli ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors

Hi, I've got a problem with booting zfs-on-root FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE. I'm getting: ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable ZFS: can't read MOS of pool klawisz gptzfsboot: failed to mount default pool klawisz Machine is VM running under KVM on Proxmox 2.3-13. VM has 8 GB of RAM, 400 GB of local storage with SCSI Controller type: Default (lsi). I'm not sure what I did to

...and world was installed without any problems. System is still up & running, with uname -a revealing r243825. I then decided to upgrade the root pool to feature flags, SPA version 5000, and was not so lucky. # zpool upgrade -a This system supports ZFS pool feature flags. cannot upgrade 'zroot': invalid argument for this pool operation Even the command: zpool upgrade zroot gives the same diagnostic as above. This isn't a critical system at all, but I guess everyone else will run into this snag when attempting to upgrade their ZFS pools. Any clues? -- +--------------------...

On Thu, July 23, 2020 15:56, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > Clearly there is, as otherwise we could not be in waitpid on it. > The process is not a python process, it will be tdbbackup. The > command line arguments to that process will be instructive. Here it is: root 36800 0.8 0.0 12556 2788 1 SJ 16:49 0:00.01 /usr/local/bin/tdbbackup -s .copy.tdb

FreeBSD-12.1p6 IOCage thick jails on ZFS, samba-4.10.15: On Fri, July 10, 2020 02:29, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 2020-07-09 21:36, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: >> set_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER. >> ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (3221225485, 'An invalid parameter was >> passed to a service or function.') > > What

...us > pool: bootpool > state: ONLINE > scan: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > bootpool ONLINE 0 0 0 > aacd0s1a ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > > pool: zroot > state: ONLINE > scan: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 > aacd0s1d.eli ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors are you using compression?...

Hi. (Im am sending this to the "stable" list, because it maybe kernel related.. ) On 9.1-RELEASE I am witnessing lockups of the openldap slapd daemon. The slapd runs for some days and then hangs, consuming high amounts of CPU. In this state slapd can only be restarted by SIGKILL. # procstat -kk 71195 PID TID COMM TDNAME KSTACK 71195

...1, 2020 04:32, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 2020-07-10 14:47, James B. Byrne wrote: >> FreeBSD-12.1p6 IOCage thick jails on ZFS, samba-4.10.15: > > Can you post the smb.conf of both DCs? > > Just out of curiosity, are you also using vfs_zfsacl? Yes. smb.confs DC1 and DC2: /zroot/iocage/jails/smb4-1a/root/usr/local/etc/smb4.conf [root at vhost04 ~ (master)]# cat /zroot/iocage/jails/smb4-1/root/usr/local/etc/smb4.conf # Global parameters [global] bind interfaces only = Yes interfaces = localhost smb4-1 netbios name = SMB4-1 realm = BROCKLEY.HARTE-LYNE.CA workgroup...

Hello zfs question about memory. I heard zfs is very ram hungry. Service looking to run: - nginx - postgres - php-fpm - python I have a machine with two quad core cpus but only 4 G Memory I'm looking to buy more ram now. What would be the recommend amount of memory for zfs across 6 drives on this setup? Also can 9.1 now boot to zfs from the installer? (no tricks for post install) Thanks

...found this out, I also found you can use something called aclmode to > pass the acls through to the underlying filesystem, just have to get > around the provision error first. > > Yes you need to set the zfs properties aclmode and aclinherit to passthrough: [root at odin ~]# zfs get all zroot/jails | grep acl zroot/jails aclmode passthrough local zroot/jails aclinherit passthrough local However that on its own did not let me provision / upgrade as samba-tool still doesn't seem to believe that acls are supported. Thanks C