search for: zorns

Is anyone successfully using the Cygwin rsync on Win2k (or NT4) as both daemon and client, with --delete-after working on the client? I can get --delete to work, but I'd prefer to delete files only on a successful transfer, to ensure that the end-user has a working collection of files, no matter what release. For some reason, --delete-after does nothing for me, even as administrator on the

Concerning this article, Christopher Zorn, "Generalized Estimating Equation Models for Correlated Data: A Review with Applications." 2001. American Journal of Political Science 45(April):470-90. The author very kindly provides data for replication on his web page: http://www.emory.edu/POLS/zorn/Data/GEE.zip. I've been comparing the Professor Zorn's results obtained with

Hi all, I'm new with R (and S), and relatively new to statistics (I'm a computer scientist), so I ask sorry in advance if my question is silly. My problem is this: I have a (sample of a) discrete time stochastic process {X_t} and I want to estimate Pr{ X_t | X_{t-l_1}, X_{t-l_2}, ..., X_{t-l_k} } where l_1, l_2, ..., l_k are some fixed time lags. It will be enough for me to compute

Hello, we're running a radio using Icecast2 and Winamp5/Oddcast as the source. We have several DJ's who broadcast from their homes, which means that the quality of the source->server connection varies wildly. Several of our DJ's have massive problems when broadcasting to Icecast: the music constantly goes on a pause, sometimes for a second or two, sometimes for long enough

Dennis Speekenbrink wrote: > Does your server have enough continuous throughput to keep up? I know it's not related to bandwidth/CPU/memory issues, at least not directly. Consider the following: I've been running tests where I've set up more than one instance of streamTranscoder - all running on the same machine as the Icecast server and with identical config files - to

Geoff Shang wrote: > You *definitely* have enough CPU? Transcodes can be expensive. Yeah, there's a lot of spare CPU power and memory. The icecast server takes 0,0% CPU and each streamTranscoder instance only takes 0,0-0,3%. This is a dedicated Icecast server with 1GHz PIII and 512 MB RAM. > Also, have you looked in the Icecast error log? Yep. Nothing there. The only clue

I have a setup where Icecast 2.2.0 is serving a single Vorbis stream. The source is either a local ices2 or a remote Winamp/Oddcast. I'm then running a streamTranscoder 1.2.8 instance on the server to transcode the Vorbis stream to MP3 on the fly and send it back to Icecast, to be served at a different mountpoint. My config files are very basic with most settings at their defaults. The

Michael Smith wrote: > This still sounds more likely to be cpu starvation than anything else It seems you were correct. After updating my kernel (!), the CPU load figures given by 'top' and 'ps' for streamTranscoder suddenly rose from 0.0-0.3% to about 30-60%. There are occasional peaks above that, which might very well be causing the problem. And the system load now shows

...orkgroup | SAMDOM But again, googling this did not enlighten me, escpecially as: | root at herakles:~# net ads workgroup | Workgroup: SAMDOM | root at fileserver:~# net ads testjoin | Join is OK Any hints are welcome... Bye, Stefan -- Die Macht des Wissens! Stefan, Trost in den Stunden des Zorns! Sloganizer, https://www.poetron-zone.de/