search for: zorghi

Hi, Dovecot Director is used to keep a temporary user -> Dovecot backend server mapping. So, Director decides which backend handles each user and the user is always redirected to the same server. All user data is stored in shared storage (NFS). The Dovecot presentation featured during this webinar

On 2014-12-01 19:56, anon_user at openmailbox.org wrote: >> Il 01/12/2014 17:11, rub zorghy ha scritto: >> Why Dovecot Director server isn't used to perform this without Dovecot >> proxy ? Thus, the load balancer (F5 Big-IP) can distribute requests >> based >> on IMAP protocol to Dovecot Director cluster. >> I think that the slide is just one example of a

Il 01/12/2014 17:11, rub zorghy ha scritto: > Why Dovecot Director server isn't used to perform this without Dovecot > proxy ? Thus, the load balancer (F5 Big-IP) can distribute requests based > on IMAP protocol to Dovecot Director cluster. I think that the slide is just one example of a scenario ,very complex. In real world, unless you do not have to segment users (some users use

Hi, I upgraded to 20150213 (f10725a5eed8+). I chose LDAP as the authentication source for Dovecot. Compilation succeeds. Starting dovecot from command line : /usr/local/sbin/dovecot -c /usr/local/etc/dovecot/ The error log contains : "dovecot: auth: Fatal: No passdbs specified in configuration file. PLAIN mechanism needs one" It works properly with Dovecot 2.0.9. Any clues or

Hi, The measurements were created under the following conditions : ? operating system : Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.6 (Santiago) kernel in version 2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64 ? virtual server (VMware) with an Intel(R) Xeon(R) 4vCPU E5649 x 2,526 GHz (2 cores per virtual socket) and 4 GB RAM ? 7,200 RPM SATA 1TB (FC SAN IBM System Storage N3400) ? all file systems had been formated in

Hi, Timo Sirainen wrote (May 19, 2010 1:50:34 am) : "When a connection from a newly seen user arrives, it gets assigned to a mail server according to a function: host = vhosts[ md5(username) mod vhosts_count ]" This hash function is it still used as it is without modification ? My another question sounds pretty innocent but I have doubts about vhosts_count. Taking two directors