search for: zomojo

Hi Clint, systemd-networkd doesn't use those files at all. On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 at 13:55 Clint Dilks <clintd at scms.waikato.ac.nz> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Phil Manuel <phil at zomojo.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > If I disable ipv6 via the kernel command line, ipv6.disable=1, then > > systemd-networkd fails to bring up any interfaces. > > > > Removing the option and networking works as expected. > > > > Hi, > > If you l...

Okay sorry about that. No Idea if it will work in CentOS, but is it worth trying to turn off ipv6 for a single nic as as outlined at https://coreos.com/os/docs/latest/network-config-with-networkd.html ? On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Phil Manuel <phil at zomojo.com> wrote: > Hi Clint, > > systemd-networkd doesn't use those files at all. > > > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 at 13:55 Clint Dilks <clintd at scms.waikato.ac.nz> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Phil Manuel <phil at zomojo.com> wrote: > &gt...

I'm trying to understand why a normal user is not allowed to unmount their USB stick? I think it is most likely a udev rule. does anyone know ? Thanks Phil.

Hi, If I disable ipv6 via the kernel command line, ipv6.disable=1, then systemd-networkd fails to bring up any interfaces. Removing the option and networking works as expected. Phil.

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Phil Manuel <phil at zomojo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > If I disable ipv6 via the kernel command line, ipv6.disable=1, then > systemd-networkd fails to bring up any interfaces. > > Removing the option and networking works as expected. > Hi, If you look at the appropriate ifcfg files eg /etc/sysconfig/netw...

Hi all, tinydns starts up fine, selinux reports no issues (now after a day of clearing errors). If I turn selinux back to permissive in /etc/sysconfig/selinux, and reboot, tinydns responds to queries. If I turn selinux back to enforcing and reboot, tinydns does not respond. Monitoring /var/log/messages shows no errors from iptables/shorewall or selinux. The only way I can find an error is

Hello, Does CentOS 5.4 support large ( > 2 TB) external storage devices using GPT (GUID Partition Tables), while the main OS resides on smaller hard disks using MBR. In this scenario, what can be the largest possible size of an ext3 partition (and filesystem) which can be created on the storage array under CentOS 5.4 ? Thanks, Manish

Hi, I built a new kernel for C7 that contains the required driver for a new motherboard we have here. I'd like to take this initramfs and rebuild it/modify it so that it is suitable for pxe booting. I have tried dracut -v --force --add "anaconda" initramfs.img # results in an image that is too large for tftp Or dracut --nofscks --nomdadmconf --nolvmconf --xz

You can get the Linux driver from http://www.realtek.com/downloads/downloadsView.aspx?Langid=1&PNid=5&PFid=5&Level=5&Conn=4&DownTypeID=3&GetDown=false#RTL8111B/RTL8168B/RTL8111/RTL8168%3Cbr%3ERTL8111C/RTL8111CP/RTL8111D%28L%29%3Cbr%3ERTL8168C/RTL8111DP if you can't find it under C7 Regards On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Alessandro Baggi <alessandro.baggi at

> On 28 Aug 2016, at 10:04 AM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Gordon Messmer > <gordon.messmer at gmail.com <mailto:gordon.messmer at gmail.com>> wrote: >> On 08/25/2016 11:35 PM, Phil Manuel wrote: >>> >>> The relevant kickstart section is:- >>> >>> part /boot/efi

Hi I have a disk which two of the partitions are part of a RAID1 setup. I'm trying to rename the the second raided partition mdadm -E /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdc4: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 1.2 Feature Map : 0x1 Array UUID : 83d7657b:ebfddcb7:36b0fa14:d29a350c Name : oldname:2 Creation Time : Tue Aug 30 15:25:10 2016 Raid Level : raid1 Raid Devices : 2

I gave up with the repo method and ended up building it from source. It worked out a lot easier. On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 at 02:35 Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > Le 18/07/2017 ? 17:42, Nicolas Kovacs a ?crit : > > I'm reading through various HOWTOs and tutorials, and it seems like I'm > > stuck very early in my fiddling process. > > > > All

Hi, If I run timemaster from systemd it fails with:- Aug 02 06:07:41 machinename timemaster[19230]: [1494069.352] process 19231 started: /usr/sbin/chronyd -u chrony -n -f /var/run/timemaster/chrony.conf Aug 02 06:07:41 machinename timemaster[19230]: [1494069.352] process 19232 started: /usr/sbin/ptp4l -l 5 -f /var/run/timemaster/ptp4l.0.conf -H -i eno1 Aug 02 06:07:41 machinename

Prior to upgrading to CentOS 7.4 everything was fine, after upgrade I'm seeing /etc/keepalived# keepalived -f /etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf --dont-fork --log-console --log-detail --dump-conf -m -v Starting VRRP child process, pid=17224 Registering Kernel netlink reflector Registering Kernel netlink command channel Registering gratuitous ARP shared channel Opening file

I am getting a seg fault and the following error when trying to use an embedded version of R in a multithreaded application. Error: C stack usage is too close to the limit When I do the same thing in a single threaded app, then there is no problem. I've tried this with R version 2.3.0, 2.3.1 and even 2.2.1 and the same error occurs. Any tips on how to solve this would be greatly

Hi All, I have a shuttle SN78SH7 with a Seagate ST31500341AS (1.5Tb) drive. With windows Vista it sees the drive and can install to it. So far with GRML or CentOS5.2 they do not seem to be able to see this drive. Is there a particular setting I need or does CentOS not support installation to these drives yet ? Thanks for your help Phil

Hi, If I do an md5sum across 4 machines all running Centos5-x86_64 on /bin/bash why does it show a different checksum ? -> ssh box4 md5sum -b /bin/bash 53d2152059125e221a38099369e5777e */bin/bash -> ssh box6 md5sum -b /bin/bash e22fb934b0a4a840a330f47559d27205 */bin/bash -> ssh box5 md5sum -b /bin/bash 34bd0269a3ca9ce15e3bf56957d95609 */bin/bash -> ssh box2 md5sum -b /bin/bash

Hi One of our developers has come across an issue with the new release. He provided this piece of code to show the problem:- cat failure.c #include </usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h> int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) { return 0; } gcc failure.c /usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:169: error: expected declaration specifiers or ?...? before ?u32? /usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h:169: error:

Hi We use AoE disks for some of our systems. Currently, a 15.65Tb filesystem we have is full, I then extended the LVM by a further 4Tb but resize4fs could not handle a filesystem over 16Tb (CentOS 5.5). I then reduced the lvm by the same amount, and attempted to create a new LV, but get this error message in the process lvcreate -v -ndata2 -L2T -t aoe Test mode: Metadata will NOT be updated.

Does anyone know if this is going to be fixed in CentOS ? // test case code below // expected behaviour is "all good" and a return code of zero. // this works on 2.6.35-1 // does not work on 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5 from Centos 5.5 // think this bug was fixed in git commit 8948e11f450e6189a79e47d6051c3d5a0b98e3f3 // around 2.6.22 // http://www.mail-archive.com/git-commits-head at