Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "zlib_librari".
Did you mean:
zlib_library
2014 Sep 17
2
[LLVMdev] proposal to avoid zlib dependency.
On 17 September 2014 16:34, Mueller-Roemer, Johannes Sebastian
<Johannes.Sebastian.Mueller-Roemer at igd.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> I'll have another look tomorrow.
Thanks.
> IMO, it is unnecessary clutter. It will fail if ${ZLIB_LIBRARIES} or ${ZLIB_INCLUDE_DIRS} are used anyways as they will be set to NOTFOUND. Or we go back to a silent-fail solution:
Fair enough. I've never been a big fan of silent failure. So perhaps
just this...
```
if (LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB )
find_package(ZLIB REQUIRED)
set(HAVE_ZLIB_H 1)
set(HAVE_...
2014 Sep 17
2
[LLVMdev] proposal to avoid zlib dependency.
On 17 September 2014 15:47, Mueller-Roemer, Johannes Sebastian
<Johannes.Sebastian.Mueller-Roemer at igd.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> It's half the way there. Configuring and compiling works, but linking fails, probably some definition mismatches...
It configured, compiled and linked okay for me. Could you look into it?
>
> But it can definitely be simplified, as due to the