Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "zhuravlyov".
2016 Aug 17
3
Memory scope proposal
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Zhuravlyov, Konstantin <Konstantin.Zhuravlyov at amd.com> wrote:
>
> >Why not going with a metadata attachment directly and kill the "singlethread" keyword? Something like:
> >Something like:
> > cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 0 monotonic monotonic, 3, !memory.scope{!42...
2016 Aug 17
2
Memory scope proposal
...at philipreames.com>
Cc: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>; Liu, Yaxun (Sam) <Yaxun.Liu at amd.com>; Ke Bai <kebai613 at gmail.com>; Mekhanoshin, Stanislav <Stanislav.Mekhanoshin at amd.com>; Sumner, Brian <Brian.Sumner at amd.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Zhuravlyov, Konstantin <Konstantin.Zhuravlyov at amd.com>; Tye, Tony <Tony.Tye at amd.com>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Memory scope proposal
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
I will comment -...
2016 Jun 25
2
Memory scope proposal
...i <mehdi.amini at apple.com>; Liu, Yaxun (Sam) <Yaxun.Liu at amd.com>; Ke Bai <kebai613 at gmail.com>; Mekhanoshin, Stanislav <Stanislav.Mekhanoshin at amd.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Tye, Tony <Tony.Tye at amd.com>; Sumner, Brian <Brian.Sumner at amd.com>; Zhuravlyov, Konstantin <Konstantin.Zhuravlyov at amd.com>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Memory scope proposal
+ Brian and Konstantin
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:18:53AM +0300, Pekka Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 02.05.2016 17:46, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
> >>Why not going wi...
2016 Aug 21
2
Memory scope proposal
> On Aug 21, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote:
>
> On 08/17/2016 03:05 PM, Mehdi Amini wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 17, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Zhuravlyov, Konstantin <Konstantin.Zhuravlyov at amd.com <mailto:Konstantin.Zhuravlyov at amd.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Why not going with a metadata attachment directly and kill the "singlethread" keyword? Something like:
>>> >Something like:
>>> &...
2016 Jul 03
2
Memory scope proposal
...e instruction semantics imposes a much larger burden on the rest of the community. That burden has to be well justified and supported.
Philip
> On Jun 25, 2016, at 7:38 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 25, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Zhuravlyov, Konstantin <Konstantin.Zhuravlyov at amd.com> wrote:
>>
>> We believe that it would be best that this is added to the LLVM IR atomic memory instruction as fields on atomic instructions rather than using meta data.
>>
>> The reasoning is that this information is simi...
2016 May 18
2
Memory scope proposal
Hi all,
On 02.05.2016 17:46, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Why not going with a metadata attachment directly and kill the "singlethread" keyword? Something like:
>> >Something like:
>> >
>> > cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 0 monotonic monotonic, 3, !memory.scope{!42}
>> > cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 0 monotonic monotonic, 3,