Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "zhuff".
Did you mean:
huff
2014 Mar 17
0
More than 150 MB / second encoding + "nanozip"
...: 805893523 bytes - 10.687 seconds
> FLAC -0: 838208659 bytes - 27.170 seconds //no idea how to remove the MD5
> checksum from the encode. The MD5 function is not SSE-accelerated and is
> pretty slow.
>
> One other variant is to use a general purpose compressor(maybe LZ4 or even
> Zhuff) and apply a filter to get the size down. I tried this and got
> miserable results, mainly because the filter that i used was slow. You may
> want to post on http://encode.ru if you wish to take this path. The site
> is not in Russian despite the last two letters.
>
> On 3/17/2014 at...
2014 Mar 16
2
More than 150 MB / second encoding ?
Hello,
Is there some version of FLAC that allows very very fast encoding (i.e.
able to process at least 150 MB / second of .wav input data on a standard
computer : laptop computer, Core i5/i7, Windows 7 64 bit, 8 GB RAM) ?
(It's ok to have a compression ratio which is a little bit lower than
traditionnal FLAC)
I'm looking for something which is between FLAC (very good ratio, slower
than