search for: zfs2

...der high load (ZFS scrub for example), the box becomes non-responsive (it continues to respond to ping but nothing else works -- not even the local console). Our only solution is to hard reset after which everything comes up normally. Logs are showing the following: Jan 8 09:44:08 prodsys-dmz-zfs2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /pci at 0,0/pci8086,3410 at 9/pci1000,72 at 0 (mpt_sas0): Jan 8 09:44:08 prodsys-dmz-zfs2 MPT SGL mem alloc failed Jan 8 09:44:08 prodsys-dmz-zfs2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /pci at 0,0/pci8086,3410 at 9/pci1000,72 at 0 (mpt_sas0):...

...9;'m building for media files but wanted to ask more specific questions about zfs here. The setup is 8x500GB SATAII drives to start and down the road another 4x750 SATAII drives, the machine will mostly be doing reads and streaming data over GigaE. -I''m under the impression that ZFS+(ZFS2) is similar to RAID6, so for the initial 8x500GB two drives would be sucked into parity so I''d have a 3TB volume with the ability to lose two discs, no? -I can''t add discs to the RAIDz volume so in the future for the 4x750 I''d just do a new RAIDz on them (one disc is for...

...g 'zpool online'. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-3C scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM pool UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas label/zfs1 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open label/zfs2 ONLINE 0 0 I have a spare disk (blank), but even though I can't make it online again ... is there any hope I can read the files in that disk ? thanks, matheus -- We will call you Cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normall...

...MAP. > > > > What is the output for: > > # zpool status > > perhaps you have a hardware issue? > All good - quite reliable hardware: IBM x3655 dual AMD quad core, 40GB of ECC RAM, 8x IBM 2.5" SAS on battery-backed ServeRAID, RAID 6 and (somewhat pointlessly) ZFS2. All IBM server diagnostics check, full RAM check run without errors, no ECC corrections reported, no uncorrectable errors reported. # zpool status pool: bootpool state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM bootpool ONLINE 0...

...hat is the output for: >> >> # zpool status >> >> perhaps you have a hardware issue? >> > > All good - quite reliable hardware: IBM x3655 dual AMD quad core, 40GB of ECC RAM, 8x IBM 2.5" SAS on battery-backed ServeRAID, RAID 6 and (somewhat pointlessly) ZFS2. All IBM server diagnostics check, full RAM check run without errors, no ECC corrections reported, no uncorrectable errors reported. > > > > # zpool status > pool: bootpool > state: ONLINE > scan: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ W...

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Dovecot 2.2.16: disappearing messages, mismatched summaries, duplicated messages, excessive full re-downloads From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> To: David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> Date: Sat Apr 18 2015 15:48:28 GMT+0300 (Arabic Standard Time) > No. My best guess is that (your) ZFS+FreeBSD is simply not behaving the way

Hello, I''m quite interested in ZFS, like everybody else I suppose, and am about to install FBSD with ZFS. On that note, i have a different first question to start with. I personally am a Linux fanboy, and would love to see/use ZFS on linux. I assume that I can use those ZFS disks later with any os that can work/recognizes ZFS correct? e.g. I can install/setup ZFS in FBSD, and later use