Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "zeyu".
Did you mean:
heyu
2005 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] can bc/asm carry enough type info for C/C++ compiler/interpreter?
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:34:07AM -0500, Zeyu Chen wrote:
> I am asking this question to see if it is possible or desirable to
> build a compilation/runtime system for C/C++ that can support the
> following:
>
> 1. allow bc to call native (in dynamically loaded *.so)
You can do this today, e.g., with lli -load=native.so file....
2005 Apr 25
2
[LLVMdev] can bc/asm carry enough type info for C/C++ compiler/interpreter?
I am asking this question to see if it is possible or desirable to build a compilation/runtime system for C/C++ that can support the following:
1. allow bc to call native (in dynamically loaded *.so)
2. allow native to call bc (through JIT or interpreter)
3. can compile/interpret C/C++ sources _BASED_ on type info in precompiled bc
Motivation:
The class files produced by the java compiler
2005 Apr 25
0
[LLVMdev] can bc/asm carry enough type info for C/C++ compiler/interpreter?
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Misha Brukman wrote:
>> But since llvm's type system is meant to be lang indep the best we can
>> do is to make debugging info descriptive enough for future
>> compilations, is this correct?
> That sounds about right. Another issue is that currently, aggressive
> optimizations change the code substantially and if there were increased
> debug