search for: zertifikates

...te doesn't match with the taken Value. Do you want to continue with this server?. sorry for the poor english translation. Here in german (for some german people): Der Server, mit dem Sie verbunden sind, verwendet ein Sicherheitszertifikat, das nicht verifiziert werden konnte. Der CN-Name des Zertifikates stimmt nicht mit dem ?bergebenen Wert ?berein. M?chten Sie diesen Server weiterhin verwenden? many thanks for some hints Richard

Good Evening, i have a serius problem by usung the search function via imap or via doveadm. If i run this command: doveadm search -u <user> mailbox INBOX text 'Hello' I receive this line in my maillog: dovecot: imap(<user>): Fatal: master: service(imap): child 7472 killed with signal 11 (core dumped) in my /var/log/apport.log i can see this: ERROR: apport

Hey, i am now a bit deeper into dovecot debugging with gdb and have a full bt now, with debugging infos. Is there a patch that resolve this Problem in dovecot 2.2.22-1ubuntu2.13 for ubuntu 16? Here the bt: (gdb) bt full #0 0x00007ffff73cf3f3 in array_count_i (array=0x555555810d38) at ../../src/lib/array.h:155 No locals. #1 message_part_finish (ctx=ctx at entry=0x555555810ce0)

Yes I've red this section and the docu is saying no FL above 2008. Might be caused by incompleted docu? So far I understand if we don't use >4.19 we will not be able to use FL 2016 which is necessary since our DC WIN22 is configured as FL2016? On 18.10.23 19:10, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > If you take a look at: > >

Hi Martin, Am 26.01.23 um 22:57 schrieb Martin Schwenke: > winbindd and smbd are only started during the CTDB startup event, so > you have to enable the event scripts before you start CTDB. > That's what I did and that's where the problem starts ;-) As soon as I enable one of the two events the cluster chrashes :-( Stefan > That hasn't changed... ? > > peace

Since I have these performance problems after migration to 2.0.5 I'm publishing my config for review. Can anybody spot any obvious signs of trouble? # 2.0.5: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic-pae i686 Debian squeeze/sid auth_debug = yes auth_debug_passwords = yes auth_mechanisms = plain login disable_plaintext_auth = no auth_master_user_separator = * mail_location =

Hello, You cannot use Active Directory Administrativ Center because samba has no ADWS implented. There where efforts and but ADWS did no reach production status. I think Catalyst, Andrew Bartlett tried someting, did not finish it. Yes you need to use the old RSAT. Gretings Daniel EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von:

Hi Stefan, On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:35:59 +0100, Stefan Kania via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I'm having a CTDB-Cluster with two nodes (both Ubuntu wit > Sernet-packages 4.17.4). Now I want to replace one of the nodes. The > first step was to bring a new node to the CTDB-Cluster. This time a > Debian 11 but with the same sernet-packages (4.17.4). Adding the

Hi Jochen, On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 00:16, Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> wrote: > > On 02/11/2020 07:07 PM, Cl?ment P?ron wrote: > > - I have X devices (around 30) and one SSH server > > - Each of them have a unique public key and create one dynamic reverse > > port forwarding on the server > > - All of them connect with the same UNIX user (I don't

Do you know wich of the RSAT I need to use to manage auth-policies and silos. With samba-tool I can't assign users and hosts to the policies. I can only create, delete, list and view policies and silos Am 19.10.23 um 09:03 schrieb Daniel M?ller via samba: > Hello, > > You cannot use Active Directory Administrativ Center because samba has no ADWS implented. > There where

Am 18.10.23 um 23:27 schrieb Matti Kaupenjohann via samba: > Yes I've red this section and the docu is saying no FL above 2008. Might > be caused by incompleted docu? So far I understand if we don't use >4.19 > we will not be able to use FL 2016 which is necessary since our DC WIN22 > is configured as FL2016? Yes you MUST usee 4.19 ;-) > > On 18.10.23 19:10,

Hi Stefan, I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the bullseye-backports. I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. As like 9.16 I use the "dlz_bind9_18.so" entry in named.conf. If you need further information to compare just ask. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um

Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Stefan, > > I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the > bullseye-backports. > > I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. > On the first DC it's running like I expacted, but on the second one I'm having the provlem. > As like 9.16 I use the

Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 03:16:00PM +0000, Jochen Bern wrote: > Out of interest: > 1. If an extended mechanism were to be implemented, which server pubkey > do you expect to be seen/stored/verified by the client? The proxy's > / v4 middlebox's, or the v6 backend's? Or would you require that all > server-side machines use the *same* host keypairs? I'd do

Hi Stefan, We had a long weekend in New Zealand, I'm catching up now to your emails. Some of the slight differences between Windows tools I've already picked up on and are in my PR Andrew Bartlett mentioned on Friday, but I'm always open to learning what things are missing or different etc. On 23/10/23 02:58, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Talking to myself again ;-) > >