Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "zerouno".
Did you mean:
zeroing
2014 Jan 09
5
Re: Best practice for custom iptables rules
Il 08/01/14 16:17, Laine Stump ha scritto:
> On 01/08/2014 01:43 PM, ZeroUno wrote:
>> Also, regarding the "iptables restart problem" described in the last
>> paragraph at <http://libvirt.org/firewall.html>, is there really no
>> acceptable way to make libvirt add its rules back automatically upon
>> iptables/network restart?
>
>...
2016 Feb 05
4
Samba 3.2 and Windows 10
Il 05/02/16 14:41, Helmut Hullen ha scritto:
>> is: if a client is upgraded to Windows 10, will it still work with
>> that old Samba version?
>
> May be - Samba 3.6 does the job.
Hi, you mean that 3.2 will not talk to Windows 10, no way?
Unfortunately the latest Samba version for Debian Lenny is 3.2.15 AFAIK.
--
01
2014 Jan 09
0
Re: Best practice for custom iptables rules
On 01/09/2014 12:38 PM, ZeroUno wrote:
> Il 08/01/14 16:17, Laine Stump ha scritto:
>
>> On 01/08/2014 01:43 PM, ZeroUno wrote:
>>> Also, regarding the "iptables restart problem" described in the last
>>> paragraph at <http://libvirt.org/firewall.html>, is there really no
>>>...
2014 Jan 08
2
Best practice for custom iptables rules
Hi,
I'm using libvirt to manage some VMs on a CentOS host, and I need some
custom iptables rules to always be in place for some communications to
happen, e.g. between the VMs and the outside world in both directions.
Some of these rules need to be at the top of the iptables chain,
otherwise the default rules added by libvirt would block the
communications I need.
So I cannot just add the
2016 Feb 05
2
Samba 3.2 and Windows 10
Hi,
in a small office an old server is running Samba 3.2.15 on Debian Lenny.
It is used for domain authentication and file sharing, and all Windows
clients - currently up to Windows 7 - work perfectly fine with that.
Now my question, to which I cannot easily find an answer on Google, is:
if a client is upgraded to Windows 10, will it still work with that old
Samba version?
A server upgrade is
2014 Jan 08
0
Re: Best practice for custom iptables rules
On 01/08/2014 01:43 PM, ZeroUno wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using libvirt to manage some VMs on a CentOS host, and I need some
> custom iptables rules to always be in place for some communications to
> happen, e.g. between the VMs and the outside world in both directions.
>
> Some of these rules need to be at the top...
2014 Jan 09
0
Re: Best practice for custom iptables rules
Il 09/01/14 11:38, ZeroUno ha scritto:
> Il 08/01/14 16:17, Laine Stump ha scritto:
>> http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#Forwarding_Incoming_Connections
>
> interesting!), AFAICT this might help with adding rules to the NAT
> table, which was the first part of my question, but does not help with
......
2014 Jan 10
2
Re: Best practice for custom iptables rules
Il 09/01/14 13:40, Laine Stump ha scritto:
> you asked for "best", not "ideal" :-) Aside from eliminating all use of
;)
> solve by itself. But that same paragraph also tells you how to have the
> iptables service signal libvirt to reload its iptables rules.
Sorry, what do you mean? I'm not able to find such an indication in that
page...
--
01
2014 Jan 13
0
Re: Best practice for custom iptables rules
On 01/10/2014 06:02 PM, ZeroUno wrote:
> Il 09/01/14 13:40, Laine Stump ha scritto:
>
>> you asked for "best", not "ideal" :-) Aside from eliminating all use of
>
> ;)
>
>> solve by itself. But that same paragraph also tells you how to have the
>> iptables service signal libvir...
2014 Jan 13
0
Re: Best practice for custom iptables rules
Il 13/01/14 04:06, Gao Yongwei ha scritto:
> how about this daemon hook script?
>
> #!/bin/bash
> #
> insert_rule() {
> sleep 2
> iptables -t nat -D CUSTOM_RULE
> iptables -t nat -I CUSTOM_RULE
> }
[...]
Thanks, I already tried inserting a delay with "sleep" but it didn't
change anything, as the hook script is not processed in parallel