Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "zerotree".
Did you mean:
zerofree
2015 Jan 18
2
NHW Image codec
Hello,
Ok, and that's too many work to review a source code.In my codec, I have 3
compression schemes, I think 2 are not patented, but the third... I don't
know.For the rest, I think my codec is patent-free (I don't use
SPIHT,EZW,zerotree methods), even the wavelet transform is new and don't
use the lifting scheme nor the convolution product.
Else, if you found time to review the codec, do not hesitate to let me know
what you think of it and if you would have remarks.Would be much
appreciated.
Cheers,
Raphael
2015-01-17 23:01...
2016 Oct 01
0
NHW codec
...(even in its current state).
For example, I have made a visual comparison for mid compression (-l2 to
-h2 setting) on 50 images of the NHW codec with BPG (HEVC intra), WebP, and
Rududu Image Compression (Rududu is a powerful wavelet image codec,
released in April 2008, that is based on SPIHT-like, zerotree coding, -it
totally went under-the-radar...-).
Results: The codec that has the more precision is BPG, the codec that has
the more neatness is NHW.Don't know what is the best criterion between
neatness and precision, but globally on 25 images out of 50 I visually
prefer the results of NHW for i...
2015 Jan 23
0
NHW Image codec
...nhwcodec at gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> Ok, and that's too many work to review a source code.In my codec, I have 3
> compression schemes, I think 2 are not patented, but the third... I don't
> know.For the rest, I think my codec is patent-free (I don't use
> SPIHT,EZW,zerotree methods), even the wavelet transform is new and don't
> use the lifting scheme nor the convolution product.
>
> Else, if you found time to review the codec, do not hesitate to let me
> know what you think of it and if you would have remarks.Would be much
> appreciated.
>
>...
2015 Jan 15
2
NHW Image codec
Hello,
Yes, that's right.I still think that it would have more weight if I could
claim that Xiph has reviewed the source code and find that the NHW codec is
royalty/patent-free (better than me alone claiming this...).Maybe it was in
this sense that Ralph Giles answered me?
Cheers,
Raphael
2015-01-15 18:02 GMT+01:00 Jason Self <jason at bluehome.net>:
> Raphael Canut asked:
>