search for: zeroshell

...68.10.10 and 192.168.10.11. It has to have persistence - i.e., be state- and session-aware. If for whatever reason one of the servers goes down the remaining pool shares all the traffic in some fashion (be it eound robin, saturation based, whatever). We have tried Vyatta ( http://vyatta.org/ ) and ZeroShell ( http://www.zeroshell.org/ ) and both are very good but their NLB seems to be externally facing (i.e., you have several internet connections and are trying to divide your traffic between them). What we need is an "internally facing" one, if I may say so. Any advice on what may help us w...

hi all, I''m writing not for technical problems but for a simple question. Do You know if there is a distro which is ready for traffic shaping etc. ''out of the box''? I mean a distro which does not require patching the kernel and/or iptables and/or installing from source etc. and gives the user most of the tools needed (imq, ipp2p, l7filter and so on). many thanks

----- Original Message Follows ----- From: kasra kangavari <kasra_kng@yahoo.com> To: fulvio.ricciardi@zeroshell.net Subject: Re: [Bridge] Passing vlan tagged packets through linux bridge(2.6.19) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 00:16:12 -0800 (PST) > Dear Fulvio > > I wanna know if your linux box ethernets are 1000 or 100 > ? > and are you sure about kernels < 2.6.15 that large tagged > pack...

...After that, I build a new remastered iso9660 file with mkisofs or xorriso, - If I use xorriso, I select isohdppx.bin as the MBR file. If I use mkisofs I need to postprocess the image with isohybrid --partok. The menu entry on syslinux.cfg for each partition is as simple as: Konsole output LABEL ZeroShell MENU LABEL ^ZeroShell COM32 boot/syslinux/c32/chain.c32 APPEND guid:xxxxx 5 So, I'm chainloading the boot sector of an hybrid iso image dumped to a partition. Everything works as expected with all distros which were built to boot with isolinux. It works because of the isohdppx.bin MBR (or t...

...ber that with older kernels (<2.6.15) large tagged packets was forwarded. What is the problem? Any chance to have a patch? Thanks in advance for your answers. Best Regards Fulvio Ricciardi -------------------------------------------------------------------- Fulvio Ricciardi web: http://www.zeroshell.net/eng/ skype: zeroshellnet Phone: +3908321835630

Hi All; I discover that most of the voice cutting complain are coming from the Internet bandwidth when we are connecting two remote offices togethor via Asterisk or any other IP PBX. Anyone has an idea on a ADSL router that work as ADSL + Bandwidth division? So we can resolve the problem of providing a guaranteed bandwidth for the voice packets instead of suffering the voice cutting? Regards

Hi, I have just configured a Linux box with kernel 2.6.16.7 and configured two ethernet interfaces (with MTU 1500) in bridge mode. CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER is enabled. The problem is that ping -s 1500 192.168.0.2 doesn't work from 192.168.0.1 if the systems are separated by the bridge. Normal ping with smaller packet size works ok. What is wrong? Best Regards Fulvio Ricciardi

Hi, We are using freeRADIUS 1.1.6. + samba 3.0.1 + krb5-1.3.2 talk to active-directory(win2k3). Followed by: http://wiki.freeradius.org/FreeRADIUS_Active_Directory_Integration_HOWTO Now it can work. But there are multiple domains in active-directory. Can samba or krb5 support mutiple domains? How to configure krb5.conf and smb.conf can let it support multiple domains?

Hi, We have integrated CISCO ISE with Samba-AD. However we are receiving the below error. “Authentication encountered an error due to the network, AD DNS misconfiguration. This may be a temporary error” However the AD Log reports the authentication is successful. I saw a bug reported at*/https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892.

So we've got a TE410P configured as E-1. The PRI is showing up as normal, I have green lights, but d channel doesnt seem to come up and i keep getting this error if i do a "pri intense debug" The carrier swears up and down that there are no issues on their end. Any thoughts? localhost*CLI> > Unnumbered frame: > SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0 > TEI: 000 EA: 1 > M3:

Hi, I have just configured a Linux box with kernel 2.6.16.7 and configured two ethernet interfaces (with MTU 1500) in bridge mode. CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER is enabled. The problem is that ping -s 1500 192.168.0.2 doesn't work from 192.168.0.1 if the systems are separated by the bridge. Normal ping with smaller packet size works ok. What is wrong? Best Regards Fulvio Ricciardi