search for: zeroise

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "zeroise".

2016 Sep 07
2
Test failures building RELEASE_3.9.0/final
...locate (check_rss_limit=false, cleared=false, alignment=8, size=<optimized out>, cache=0x2111e20 <__msan::fallback_allocator_cache>, this=0x212c9a0 <__msan::allocator>) at ../projects/compiler-rt/lib/msan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.h:1324 #4 __msan::MsanAllocate (zeroise=false, alignment=8, size=82, stack=0x7fffffffcf10) at ../projects/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_allocator.cc:125 #5 __msan::MsanReallocate (stack=stack at entry=0x7fffffffcf10, old_p=old_p at entry=0x0, new_size=new_size at entry=82, alignment=alignment at entry=8, zeroise=zeroise at entry=false)...
2016 Sep 07
2
-fsanitize=memory failing on 3.9.0
...locate (check_rss_limit=false, cleared=false, alignment=8, size=<optimized out>, cache=0x210de20 <__msan::fallback_allocator_cache>, this=0x21289a0 <__msan::allocator>) at ../projects/compiler-rt/lib/msan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.h:1324 #4 __msan::MsanAllocate (zeroise=false, alignment=8, size=73, stack=0x7fffffffcea0) at ../projects/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_allocator.cc:125 #5 __msan::MsanReallocate (stack=stack at entry=0x7fffffffcea0, old_p=old_p at entry=0x0, new_size=new_size at entry=73, alignment=alignment at entry=8, zeroise=zeroise at entry=false)...
2016 Sep 07
4
Test failures building RELEASE_3.9.0/final
I've "successfully" built 3.9.0 release but when I run "ninja check-all" I got 208 Unexpected failures: Expected Passes : 33997 Expected Failures : 198 Unsupported Tests : 685 Unexpected Failures: 208 Below is the log I captured running "time ninja check-all | tee ninja-check-all.txt" https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-KTY7zi7eZHU2hGYTRtd01QZjA
2014 Jan 28
3
[PATCH] Proposal for a pacifier option with mkdiskimage
Hi, me: > > [mkdiskimage] -s does not prevent zeroizing on block device. Probably > > because truncate() fails. hpa: > Yes, we should probably fix that. The tool was originally designed for > images, not for hardware devices, and it doesn't make much sense to zero > the whole hardware device like that. Maybe for privacy reasons ? But indeed: -s should skip zeroizing,