search for: zelazni

What's the set of valid characters that can occur in an LLVM symbol name? The reason I ask is that my compiler is generating symbols based on method names. Some methods are operators, and I haven't got around to mangling the names yet. As a result it's producing symbols that look like _f_+ and _f_:=. LLVM seems to be coping fine with these so far and the IR output is quoting them,

On Sep 11, 2010, at 11:03 AM, David Given wrote: > What's the set of valid characters that can occur in an LLVM symbol name? > > The reason I ask is that my compiler is generating symbols based on > method names. Some methods are operators, and I haven't got around to > mangling the names yet. As a result it's producing symbols that look > like _f_+ and _f_:=. >

On 02/23/11 02:46, Chris Lattner wrote: [...] > Remember that this isn't intended to be something users deal with, it's just an internal implementation detail of the compiler, debugger, nm implementation, etc. Can I put in a plea to have as much of LLVM as possible *not* require knowledge of a single, specific architecture to work? I have various things I would like to do that work on

Hi All, There is recently a discussion on the LLDB list about how to deal with targets, and our current mismash of llvm::Triple and the various subclasses of TargetSubtarget leave a lot to be desired. GNU target triples are really important as input devices to the compiler (users want to specify them) but they aren't detailed enough for internal clients. Anyway, in short, I think that we