search for: zealey

.... About our setup: These are on an nfs-mounted file system. It's shared between two computers and connections are randomly redirected to either box; so potentially it could be an nfs type corruption issue. Timo, I'll send you a tarball of the dovecot* files off-list Thanks, Mark -- Mark Zealey -- Shared Hosting Team Leader Product Development * Webfusion 123-reg.co.uk, webfusion.co.uk, donhost.co.uk, supanames.co.uk This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer

Hi, About a week ago I upgraded our reasonably heavily loaded mail servers from a pretty recent courier version to dovecot-1.1rc10. IMAP performance on dovecot is amazing, however POP3 performance is worse than courier :-( I have uploaded some munin graphs taken today to http://linweb.atlas.pipex.net/dovecot/; the dovecot server is handling about 2000 pop logins/sec and 300 imap sessions (but

Hi there, I'm using dovecot 2.0.16 with a mysql user database. From time to time when we have a big influx of messages (perhaps more than 30 concurrent rcpt to:<> sessions at the same time so no auth-workers free?) or when we have a transient issue connecting to the database server, we see the message: Jan 25 16:38:23 mailbox dovecot: auth-worker: sql(foo at bar.com,1.2.3.4):

...ecot/ protocols: imap pop3 mail_location: maildir:~/Maildir mmap_disable: yes mail_nfs_storage: yes mail_nfs_index: yes lock_method: dotlock maildir_copy_preserve_filename: yes mbox_write_locks: dotlock This happens for both pop and imap (however more frequently with imap). Thanks, Mark -- Mark Zealey -- Shared Hosting Team Leader Product Development * Webfusion 123-reg.co.uk, webfusion.co.uk, donhost.co.uk, supanames.co.uk This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer

Dear All, I'm having an intermittent problem, with dovecot slowing to a crawl. Restarting dovecot fixes the problem. Looking at the maillog, I see loads of these errors.... dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files dovecot: Temporary failure in creating login processes, slowing down for now dovecot: Created login processes successfully, unstalling looking at the processes, I can see

My existing pop3/imap environment is courier imap + vpopmail + qmail with MySQL backend. I'm looking at migrating this to Dovecot. Currently I have multiple instances of Courier bound to different loopback IPs (the IPs correspond with the virtual IPs on a server load balancer). When a user authenticates they don't have to specify a domain - if they don't, Courier will use a

...end deliver to make it either pick up the domain (or correct username) from the command line, but not do an authdb lookup; or get it to read the domain from an environment variable (or be able to print the contents of an arbitrary environment variable in a formatted string)? Thanks, Mark -- Mark Zealey -- Shared Hosting Team Leader Product Development * Webfusion 123-reg.co.uk, webfusion.co.uk, donhost.co.uk, supanames.co.uk This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer

Hi there, I've just been experimenting with the latest courier-dovecot-migrate.pl script and I notice that it favours keeping pop3 UIDL ordering rather than IMAP UID preservation. There is this comment (line 312): # POP3 clients may want to get POP3 UIDLs in the same order always. # Preserve the order even if it causes IMAP UIDs to change. Does anyone have details as to which

...t from deliever potentially causing a high amount of io). My current work-around is to use postlogin to remove the uidlist file when someone logs in to the mailbox for the first time which then forces it to be created in the correct order; but this is a very messy solution. Thanks, Mark -- Mark Zealey -- Platform Architect Product Development * Webfusion 123-reg.co.uk, webfusion.co.uk, donhost.co.uk, supanames.co.uk This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer

...the time (only something like 400-500; we've had 1.5k in the past), so I suspect this is a regression between 1.1.6 and 1.1.7 where you've got a leak of fd's ? If it happens again I'll try and get a snapshot of the fd's open by the master dovecot process. Thanks, Mark -- Mark Zealey -- Shared Hosting Team Leader Product Development * Webfusion 123-reg.co.uk, webfusion.co.uk, donhost.co.uk, supanames.co.uk This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer

...with deliver is (v1.1.1)? 2008-07-03T09:45:19+01:00 mail4 deliver(alexander): Panic: file mail-index-transaction.c: line 642 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed: (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq) Seen a few of these this morning. Mark -- Mark Zealey -- Shared Hosting Team Leader Product Development * Webfusion 123-reg.co.uk, webfusion.co.uk, donhost.co.uk, supanames.co.uk This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer

Following on from this thread: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-September/052704.html <https://owa2010.webfusion.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=a447887e3d204944a8c766142df41453&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dovecot.org%2flist%2fdovecot%2f2010-September%2f052704.html> in 2.0.16 I am seeing the same issues. I believe this would be related to some timeouts set on our mysql servers which are pretty

Hello All, We are struggling to find a solution to a problem we are encountering with a load-balanced email setup. Currently, we have a Coyote loadbalancer, and 3 Postfix/Dovecot nodes that then get their information from a mysql database. The problem is that after a couple weeks, we start seeing NFS locking issues occur, which then takes email completely down, requiring a site visit to

Hi there, We're trying to convert users from Maildir to sdbox at present; I'm using dsync to achieve this (2.0.16) however when the user's have been converted we only get minimal information in the caching files. Is there some way to preserve all the caching decisions that were previously made so that when the user logs in to the new mailbox we don't have to cause an io storm

...to make dovecot just do as much as it can under the circumstances ie allow read access to mails? Also, has anyone got experience of how clients handle mailboxes being read-only? My guess is that pop clients would probably break and download the same messages over and over? Thanks, Mark -- Mark Zealey -- Shared Hosting Team Leader Product Development * Webfusion 123-reg.co.uk, webfusion.co.uk, donhost.co.uk, supanames.co.uk This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer

...ly for speed of setup, simply storing everything on a filesystem is easy so I'm not suggesting that we abandon this route, but for truly large infrastructures I think being able to use a database system would have significant advantages in each of these four areas. Any thoughts? Mark -- Mark Zealey -- Platform Architect Product Development * Webfusion 123-reg.co.uk, webfusion.co.uk, donhost.co.uk, supanames.co.uk This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer

...f there were an easy way to see how much space an individual imap account used when a user logged out; something like pop3_logout_format = size=%s. I appreciate that this isn't so easy in imap though - I was thinking of using the quota plugin with no limit or something like that. Mark -- Mark Zealey -- Shared Hosting Team Leader Product Development * Webfusion 123-reg.co.uk, webfusion.co.uk, donhost.co.uk, supanames.co.uk This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer

Hi, I'm in the process of upgrading from dovecot v1.1 to dovecot 2. We fetch uid/gid user information from a database and also use post-login scripting with mail_drop_priv_before_exec = yes which means the postlogin script is executed with the permissions of the user we have found in the database. According to the dovecot2 wiki page, to get this behaviour in version 2 we have to set the

Hi all, I'm currently changing some systems to use the redirector service, which means that to get local deliveries going I need to get lmtp set up so it can be redirected as well. This is working fine, however we have a number of different ports running on our servers depending on which brand a customer is using. When the time comes to do the user look up, we use (port, user, domain) to

I'm in the process of following John's excellent instructions for transfering an NT4 domain to Samba 3.0.20 running on 2.6.9-gentoo-r6 on an Intel box. Most things seem to work fine apart from the transfer of the machine accounts. These do not get moved because as retrieved from the NT server the name is in upper case and adduser refuses to add names in upper case, so I get the