search for: zdevs

On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > From: Michael S Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not > necessarily all of it. > To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. > Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of > the number of mappings created, and only clear out the

On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > From: Michael S Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not > necessarily all of it. > To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. > Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of > the number of mappings created, and only clear out the

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Convert the S390 IOMMU driver to use the probe_device() and release_device() call-backs of iommu_ops, so that the iommu core code does the group and sysfs setup. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 22 ++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git

From: Michael S Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not necessarily all of it. To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of the number of mappings created, and only clear out the mapping for a BAR when this number reaches 0. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin

From: Michael S Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not necessarily all of it. To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of the number of mappings created, and only clear out the mapping for a BAR when this number reaches 0. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin

Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not necessarily all of it. To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of the number of mappings created, and only clear out the mapping for a BAR when this number reaches 0. Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com> Cc: linux-pci at vger.kernel.org

Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not necessarily all of it. To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of the number of mappings created, and only clear out the mapping for a BAR when this number reaches 0. Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com> Cc: linux-pci at vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:13:37PM +0100, Sebastian Ott wrote: > On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > From: Michael S Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > > > Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not > > necessarily all of it. > > To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. > > Since multiple ranges can now be

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:13:37PM +0100, Sebastian Ott wrote: > On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > From: Michael S Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > > > Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not > > necessarily all of it. > > To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. > > Since multiple ranges can now be

Hello, We have a new Thor here with 24TB of disk in (first of many, hopefully). We are trying to determine the bext practices with respect to file system management and sizing. Previously, we have tried to keep each file system to a max size of 500GB to make sure we could fit it all on a single tape, and to minimise restore times and impact should we experience some kind of volume

On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not > necessarily all of it. > To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. > Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of > the number of mappings created, and only clear out the mapping for a BAR > when this number reaches 0. >

On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not > necessarily all of it. > To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. > Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of > the number of mappings created, and only clear out the mapping for a BAR > when this number reaches 0. >

iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first

iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first

iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first

iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first

iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first

iommufd follows the same design as KVM and uses memory cgroups to limit the amount of kernel memory a iommufd file descriptor can pin down. The various internal data structures already use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT to charge its own memory. However, one of the biggest consumers of kernel memory is the IOPTEs stored under the iommu_domain and these allocations are not tracked. This series is the first

This is on top of 3.19 master + my bugfix patches, and adds virtio 1.0 support to virtio pci. This is 3.20 material I think. Would like to get feedback on s390 change as it's untested. Michael S Tsirkin (2): pci: add pci_iomap_range s390: add pci_iomap_range Michael S. Tsirkin (2): virtio_pci: modern driver virtio_pci: macros for PCI layout offsets. Rusty Russell (1): virtio-pci:

This is on top of 3.19 master + my bugfix patches, and adds virtio 1.0 support to virtio pci. This is 3.20 material I think. Would like to get feedback on s390 change as it's untested. Michael S Tsirkin (2): pci: add pci_iomap_range s390: add pci_iomap_range Michael S. Tsirkin (2): virtio_pci: modern driver virtio_pci: macros for PCI layout offsets. Rusty Russell (1): virtio-pci: