search for: zbeeble

So I have a system running: FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28 03:02:55 EDT 2013 root at walk.dclg.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STRIKE i386 and it has two 2T SATA disks. To keep this post short, the crash.txt is here. https://uk.eicat.ca/owncloud/public.php?service=files&t=fea9d25579fe0c4afb808859e80e1493 now curiously, while running a "make -j4

...uctions for wbinfo to find that SID so I can ldbedit it. But you see my problem: wbinfo for finding SIDs is broke. Now... I've put my time into this. I've broken out ktrace and log level = 10. I've put a whole afternoon into this. Log stuff is a _bit_ interesting. When I wbinfo -i zbeeble, I get: [2016/07/11 01:10:37.408526, 1, pid=24476, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../librpc/ndr/ndr.c:439(ndr_print_function_debu g) wbint_LookupName: struct wbint_LookupName in: struct wbint_LookupName domain : * domain...

OK. "net cache flush" worked (dunno why a restart isn't equivalent, but hey). So let's start peeling back other issues! On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 11/07/16 17:57, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > >> >> >> - Whether I use BIND9_DLZ or I use SAMBA_INTERNAL, >> samba_dnsupdate

...nd that SID so I can > ldbedit it. But you see my problem: wbinfo for finding SIDs is broke. > > Now... I've put my time into this. I've broken out ktrace and log level = > 10. I've put a whole afternoon into this. Log stuff is a _bit_ > interesting. When I wbinfo -i zbeeble, I get: > > [2016/07/11 01:10:37.408526, 1, pid=24476, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] > ../librpc/ndr/ndr.c:439(ndr_print_function_debu > g) > wbint_LookupName: struct wbint_LookupName > in: struct wbint_LookupName > domain : *...

In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when this will be MFC'd to 7.x. This query has been studiously ignored as other chatter about whatever ZFS issue is discussed. So in a post with no other bug report or discussion content to distract us, when is it intended that ZFS be MFC'd to 7.x?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble at gmail.com> wrote: > OK. "net cache flush" worked (dunno why a restart isn't equivalent, but > hey). So let's start peeling back other issues! > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > >> On 11/07/16 17:57,...

Sep 21 08:57:54 belle fsck: /dev/ad4s1d: 1 DUP I=190 Sep 21 08:57:54 belle fsck: /dev/ad4s1d: UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. Ok, so I ran fsck manually (even with -y), but yet it refuses to clear/fix whatever to the questions posed as fsck runs. What does this all mean? Thanks, -Clint -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner,

So... in the provision script, at some point after "self join" is printed, we do: smbd.set_simple_acl(file.name, 0755, gid) .... where file.name is "/var/db/samba4/sysvol/tmpwXFu1C" and gid is 0 (at least on FreeBSD). the "OSError" here is a '-1' ... which is startlingly unhelpful. ... but the filesystem is zfs and acls of both posix and nfsv4 are working.

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > See inline comments > > On 11/07/16 06:32, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > >> So... I've been running Samba 3.6 for too long and I upgraded. I did save >> my packages for 3.6, but I don't _think_ I'm going back. >> >> Points for the group: >> >> -