Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "zap_pte".
Did you mean:
kmap_pte
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 2/9] 00mm2 pte clear not present.patch
...R_NOT_PRESENT_FULL
+#define pte_clear_not_present_full(__mm, __address, __ptep, __full) \
do { \
pte_clear((__mm), (__address), (__ptep)); \
} while (0)
===================================================================
--- a/mm/fremap.c
+++ b/mm/fremap.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static int zap_pte(struct mm_struct *mm,
} else {
if (!pte_file(pte))
free_swap_and_cache(pte_to_swp_entry(pte));
- pte_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
+ pte_clear_not_present_full(mm, addr, ptep, 0);
}
return !!page;
}
===================================================================
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b...
2007 Nov 21
5
Next steps with pv_ops for Xen
Hi all,
I've been looking at the next steps to try to get Xen running fully on
top of pv_ops. To that end, I've (just) started looking at one of the
next major jobs --- i686 dom0 on pv_ops.
There are still a number of things needing done to reach parity with
xen-unstable:
x86_64 xen on pv_ops
Paravirt framebuffer/keyboard
CPU hotplug
Balloon
kexec
driver domains
but it
2007 Nov 21
5
Next steps with pv_ops for Xen
Hi all,
I've been looking at the next steps to try to get Xen running fully on
top of pv_ops. To that end, I've (just) started looking at one of the
next major jobs --- i686 dom0 on pv_ops.
There are still a number of things needing done to reach parity with
xen-unstable:
x86_64 xen on pv_ops
Paravirt framebuffer/keyboard
CPU hotplug
Balloon
kexec
driver domains
but it
2007 Nov 21
5
Next steps with pv_ops for Xen
Hi all,
I've been looking at the next steps to try to get Xen running fully on
top of pv_ops. To that end, I've (just) started looking at one of the
next major jobs --- i686 dom0 on pv_ops.
There are still a number of things needing done to reach parity with
xen-unstable:
x86_64 xen on pv_ops
Paravirt framebuffer/keyboard
CPU hotplug
Balloon
kexec
driver domains
but it
2006 Mar 14
12
[RFC] VMI for Xen?
I''m sure everyone has seen the drop of VMI patches for Linux at this
point, but just in case, the link is included below.
I''ve read this version of the VMI spec and have made my way through most
of the patches. While I wasn''t really that impressed with the first
spec wrt Xen, the second version seems to be much more palatable.
Specifically, the code inlining and
2007 Apr 18
15
[PATCH 0 of 13] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It
didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ]
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The
patches should
2007 Apr 18
15
[PATCH 0 of 13] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It
didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ]
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The
patches should
2007 Mar 28
2
[PATCH 2/3] User-space grant table device - main driver
A character device for accessing (in user-space) pages that have been
granted by other domains.
Signed-off-by: Derek Murray <Derek.Murray@cl.cam.ac.uk>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel