search for: zahar

I wrote a test application which is based on libuv. iptables is disabled. I’m running the test application from two other machines. Do you have any suggestions for testing? thanks! —zahar > On Jun 10, 2016, at 2:38 PM, Alejandro <cdgraff at gmail.com> wrote: > > Zahar, how are you testing? with some CURL stress test? BTW, IPTABLES is enabled? > > I was running most time in VMWARE, but i run 10k users in medium size box in AWS, just move out for the high tran...

I’m going to try to run multiple curl processes. The libuv code that i wrote is not of a very good quality (even though it’s really simple). thanks! —zahar > On Jun 10, 2016, at 2:43 PM, Alejandro <cdgraff at gmail.com> wrote: > > In the past, i had used this method: > > http://icecast.org/loadtest/1/ <http://icecast.org/loadtest/1/> > > But to be honest, nothing be compared with real use case, we found many issues...

...<burst-on-connect>1</burst-on-connect><br /> <burst-size>65536</burst-size><br /></limits></p></div><div>Your queue-size is larger, i will try to increase that.</div><div> </div><div>thanks!</div><div>--zahar</div><div> </div><div>10.06.2016, 14:31, "Alejandro" <cdgraff@gmail.com>:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>Please share your config, almost the LIMITS part, this is my setup</div><div> </div><div&gt...

...est/1/ But to be honest, nothing be compared with real use case, we found many issues when the connections arrive from many differents IPs, the stress test open all from small set of IPs, but almost this test case is used for many others, and present good results. 2016-06-10 2:40 GMT-03:00 Popov, Zahar <zahar.popov1978 at yandex.com>: > I wrote a test application which is based on libuv. iptables is disabled. > I’m running the test application from two other machines. > > Do you have any suggestions for testing? > > thanks! > —zahar > > > > On Jun 10, 2016,...

Sorry, 35K concurrent with 8 workers at 60% cpu 2016-06-10 1:28 GMT-03:00 Alejandro <cdgraff at gmail.com>: > Hi Zahar, what value has into > > <workers>8</workers> > > This value is recommended to set at 1 by virtual core. > > I 'm using for some years, KH branch with 35 concurrent listeners into 8 > core vm. > > Regards, > Alejandro > > 2016-06-10 0:50 GMT-0...

Zahar, how are you testing? with some CURL stress test? BTW, IPTABLES is enabled? I was running most time in VMWARE, but i run 10k users in medium size box in AWS, just move out for the high transfer cost. 2016-06-10 2:36 GMT-03:00 Zahar Popov <zahar.popov1978 at yandex.com>: > Hi Alejandro,...

Hi Alejandro, Many thanks for your message. I changed it to 4 (i have 4 cores), but it didn’t really help. I see that all 4 cores are now working, but the connections are still being dropped. Which VM type are you using? Or it’s not running on AWS? thanks! —zahar > On Jun 10, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Alejandro <cdgraff at gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry, 35K concurrent with 8 workers at 60% cpu > > 2016-06-10 1:28 GMT-03:00 Alejandro <cdgraff at gmail.com <mailto:cdgraff at gmail.com>>: > Hi Zahar, what value has into > >...

...;524288</queue-size> <client-timeout>30</client-timeout> <header-timeout>15</header-timeout> <source-timeout>10</source-timeout> <burst-size>65535</burst-size> </limits> 2016-06-10 2:28 GMT-03:00 Popov, Zahar <zahar.popov1978 at yandex.com>: > Hi Alejandro, > Many thanks for your message. > > I changed it to 4 (i have 4 cores), but it didn’t really help. I see that > all 4 cores are now working, but the connections are still being dropped. > > Which VM type are you using? Or...

...;<div> </div><div>I assume that there is some other setting of the stack that i didn't configure so i was wondering if anybody was able to run a few dozens of thousands of connections on one server. </div><div> </div><div>thanks!</div><div>--zahar</div>

...e machines when using iperf. Certainly, the workload completely different, but at least i know that the TCP stack is somewhat operational. Do you happen to know specifically what’s broken? I don’t have access to a physical data center this is why i would like to use either EC2 or Azure. thanks! —zahar > On Jun 10, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Philipp Schafft <lion at lion.leolix.org> wrote: > > Good noon, > > On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 12:50 +0900, Zahar Popov wrote: >> Hello >> I'm trying to measure the performance of the icecast relay server on >> 64kbps streams....

Hi Zahar, what value has into <workers>8</workers> This value is recommended to set at 1 by virtual core. I 'm using for some years, KH branch with 35 concurrent listeners into 8 core vm. Regards, Alejandro 2016-06-10 0:50 GMT-03:00 Zahar Popov <zahar.popov1978 at yandex.com>:...

Good noon, On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 12:50 +0900, Zahar Popov wrote: > Hello > I'm trying to measure the performance of the icecast relay server on > 64kbps streams. > > The server is running in AWS [...]. I'm using the icecast-kh fork. > [...] > I'm able to go up to around 9K simultaneous connections to the server &g...

All, What would be the most efficient way to load the data at the following address into a dataframe? http://ratings.fide.com/top.phtml?list=men Thanks, David -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Loading-Chess-Data-tp4642006.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.