search for: zaghen

Hi all, We recently stumbled upon some issues with the DEBUG() macro being redefined in some internal libraries and some external ones, such as LLVM. After trying out a few ideas to avoid the problem we thought that the simplest solution would be to prefix all generic macro names in order to avoid clashes. A quick search showed that Mesa had a similar issue with DEBUG being used by LLVM and

+1, claiming the "DEBUG" macro is pretty hostile. Debug.h is included pretty widely from llvm/include/llvm/*, so we can't claim this is some internal macro that users won't see. On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:18 AM Nicola Zaghen via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > We recently stumbled upon some issues with the DEBUG() macro being > redefined in some internal libraries and some external ones, such as > LLVM. After trying out a few ideas to avoid the problem we thought that &...

...ointer, but for Arm targets the LSB is used to indicate if the function is a Thumb function. Mikhail proposes to extend the datalayout. * Anastasia Stulova is still [seeking feedback](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-March/057355.html) on a proposal to add OpenCL C++ support. * Nicola Zaghen has shared an RFC on [changing the `DEBUG()` macro to `LLVM_DEBUG()`](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-March/122097.html). So far, everyone agrees this is a worthwhile change. * Dan Liew is looking to [revive the DebugIR pass](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-March/122013...