Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "z21".
Did you mean:
21
2009 May 21
2
Naming a random effect in lmer
...estsamp)
I have no problems with this. However, if the set of random effects has a
dimension of 30, then the lmer call is:
fit2<-lmer(LogY ~ WYear + (1 | Site) + (1 | Year) + (1 | Z1+Z2 + Z3 + Z4 +
Z5 + Z6 + Z7 + Z8 + Z9 + Z10 + Z11 + Z12 + Z13 + Z14 + Z15 + Z16 + Z17 +
Z18 + Z19 + Z20 + Z21 + Z22 + Z23 + Z24 + Z25 + Z26 + Z27 + Z28 + Z29+
Z30), data = testsamp)
In this case, I get an error because the name "Z1+Z2 + Z3 + Z4 + Z5 + Z6 +
Z7 + Z8 + Z9 + Z10 + Z11 + Z12 + Z13 + Z14 + Z15 + Z16 + Z17 + Z18 + Z19 +
Z20 + Z21 + Z22 + Z23 + Z24 + Z25 + Z26 + Z27 + Z28 + Z29+ Z30"...
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...1 819014 0 0.06 818980 0 0.07 818980
z15.ll 10 235166 0 0.03 235132 0 0.03 235132
z16.ll 4 216158 0 0.02 216124 0 0.02 216124
z17.ll 4 71142 0 0.01 71108 0 0.02 71108
z18.ll 5 586018 0 0.05 585984 0 0.05 585984
z19.ll 5 904309 0 0.08 904275 0 0.08 904275
z20.ll 2 777109 0 0.06 777075 0 0.06 777075
z21.ll 1 443111 0 0.04 443077 0 0.04 443077
z22.ll 12 1244660 0 0.09 1244626 0 0.10 1244626
z23.ll 3 656308 0 0.06 656274 0 0.05 656274
z24.ll 0 34384 0 0.01 34350 0 0.01 34350
z25.ll 0 451 0 0.01 417 0 0.01 417
z26.ll 3 51862 0 0.01 51828 0 0.01 51828
z27.ll 0 451 0 0.01 417 0 0.01 417
z28.ll 7 31253...