search for: ypismerov

> Hi, > Sorry if this is a stupid question (bit of a newbie). I'm building a Samba > fileserver on a box with a hardware raid array of about 65GB which I'm > hoping to share out to the local LAN . I was wondering if the filesystem > used (ext2,ext3, reiserfs etc) on the partition where the Samba shares > will reside makes much of a difference? I'd obviously like to

I hate this. And I guess I'm not alone... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: NDN: Re: [Samba] Samba PDC+LDAP: Account restrictions Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:34:13 +0100 From: "Mailer-Daemon" <Mailer-Daemon@student.skelleftea.se> To: ypismerov@tucows.com Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: J. R?nnblom (Mailbox or Conference is full.)

...mailing lists have means to deal with that so you can have the list > address as the default reply to. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Yura Pismerov" <ypismerov@tucows.com> > To: "Eric" <emaquili@ductape.net> > Cc: <samba@samba.org> > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:54 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] something wrong with the list (or its members) > > > > Eric wrote: > > > > > > On 10/18 10:24,...

A stupid question. With new printing system (spoolss) how people restrict access to the printers ? It was clear with the old system when each printer was in a separate share. I could assign a list of valid users for each printer share. TIA. -- Yuri Pismerov, Sr. System Administrator, TUCOWS.COM INC. (416) 535-0123 ext. 1352

I've noticed the list has pretty low answer:question ratio. I tend to think that many replies go directly to people who post the questions and those people never bother to share the answers with the community. I don't think this is fair so we may want to do something in this regard. We either need certain rules that will imply posting of summaries (as {SUN,LINUX}managers lists do), or the

Hi I want users to edit each other files, but not having the ownership changed at all I.e. user1 create a word doc, user2 can edit it, but the ownership is not changed to user2. force create mode force directory mode force user force group I know of these , but our share have tons of dirs with files that have different users and groups, 60+ developers working together. Are there any new

...t to add machines to this container.. I would rather put them in something like "ou=hosts, dc=domain".. I have many more questions.... but don't want to change the topic too much... Jonathan Higgins Network Service Specialist IV jhiggins@kennesaw.edu >>> Yura Pismerov <ypismerov@tucows.com> 10/31/02 07:38PM >>> Here what you could use: LDAP with Kerberos password backend. Samba 2.2.6 PDC with LDAP backend. Windows passwords are stored in LDAP in samba object, not in Kerberos KDC since they use incompatible encryption methods. Use Kerberos passwords as prima...

...onfigured. Then you use add user script=/path/smbldap-useradd.pl -w %m$ > I have many more questions.... but don't want to change the topic too much... :) > > Jonathan Higgins > Network Service Specialist IV > jhiggins@kennesaw.edu > > >>> Yura Pismerov <ypismerov@tucows.com> 10/31/02 07:38PM >>> > > Here what you could use: > > LDAP with Kerberos password backend. > Samba 2.2.6 PDC with LDAP backend. > > Windows passwords are stored in LDAP in samba object, not in Kerberos > KDC since they use incompatible encryption m...

I'm going to implement ACLs with my Samba PDC that runs LDAP on backend. Do I need to run winbind ? I've heard that winbind is mandatory for ACLs to work, All my users and groups reside in LDAP database, hence they have same names in bot Unix and Windows realms. Do I still need winbind ? TIA.

Did anybody get to work password change enforcement with Samba PDC running LDAP ? It looks like it is "semi-working". I was able to enforce password change with USRMGR, but now it keeps asking me for the password change every time. I checked the pwdMustChange attribute and it is still set to 0 for some reason (hence checkbox for the password change enforcement in USRMGR is still checked

I'm not sure if this is normal or not. I run Samba 2.2.5 with LDAP on RH Linux 7.2. The thing is, it only works correctly when nscd is running. Otherwise it can't getpwnam and fails with no uid error. Interesting thing, there is no such effect on Debian Linux. Weird... pdb_ldap.c: sys_user = sys_getpwnam(username); if (sys_user == NULL) { DEBUG

Hi all, I've compiled samba --with-quotas, turned on user and group quotas on ext3, assigned quotas, BUT it does not seem to be working. Windows client always shows all available space instead of showing the quota. Do I miss something ? P.S. I run Debian with 2.4.19 kernel patched for ext3 ACL support (from acl.bestbits.at). -- Yuri Pismerov, Sr. System Administrator, TUCOWS.COM INC.

Correct me if I'm wrong. With Samba 2.2.5, there is no way to get a group of users to manage printers so they be able to select/deselect duplex mode, tray, etc. Although I'm able to add a group with the Security tab and give them appropriate permissions, it doe not work from the user side - all the settings are still grayed out. P.S. I use LDAP backend if that matters. -- Yuri