search for: yourslef

...probably make Samba4 a good replacement for SBS. > > Rowland > >>> sssd unsupported? You must be joking. It's Red Hat! OK, it costs a >>> fortune >>> but you can always get the Fedora version with mailing list support. >>> Or, >>> build it yourslef even. >> I am talking about "supported by Samba upstream", >> not about "supported by a vendor or distribution". >> >> Also, in case you are not aware: >> The AD/DC setup of Samba is not (yet) supported >> by RedHat or Fedora. You need a self-...

...samba.org/ > > There are already many. Start with 10886. Ah, thanks for the pointer. We need to follow up on that. > sssd unsupported? You must be joking. It's Red Hat! OK, it costs a fortune > but you can always get the Fedora version with mailing list support. Or, > build it yourslef even. I am talking about "supported by Samba upstream", not about "supported by a vendor or distribution". Also, in case you are not aware: The AD/DC setup of Samba is not (yet) supported by RedHat or Fedora. You need a self-compiled Samba for that. Not sure about the support...

On 2015-11-08 at 22:50 +0100, buhorojo wrote: > On 08/11/15 21:01, Michael Adam wrote: > >On 2015-11-08 at 20:34 +0100, buhorojo wrote: > >>sssd's uses its own implementation of winbind > >I repeat: sssd does not implement winbind. > >It implements some parts of the winbind protocol. > >It is not a drop-in replacement for winbind(d). > >And the ad-dc

...pported external application, > please submit a bug report at https://bugzilla.samba.org/ There are already many. Start with 10886. sssd unsupported? You must be joking. It's Red Hat! OK, it costs a fortune but you can always get the Fedora version with mailing list support. Or, build it yourslef even. By all means wait until winbind is fixed. However, those of us with work to do need it to work now. Reliably! Thanks again.

...longest running bug of all! If it was fixed it would probably make Samba4 a good replacement for SBS. Rowland >> sssd unsupported? You must be joking. It's Red Hat! OK, it costs a fortune >> but you can always get the Fedora version with mailing list support. Or, >> build it yourslef even. > I am talking about "supported by Samba upstream", > not about "supported by a vendor or distribution". > > Also, in case you are not aware: > The AD/DC setup of Samba is not (yet) supported > by RedHat or Fedora. You need a self-compiled > Samba for...

...acement for SBS. > > > >Rowland > > > >>>sssd unsupported? You must be joking. It's Red Hat! OK, it costs a > >>>fortune > >>>but you can always get the Fedora version with mailing list support. > >>>Or, > >>>build it yourslef even. > >>I am talking about "supported by Samba upstream", > >>not about "supported by a vendor or distribution". > >> > >>Also, in case you are not aware: > >>The AD/DC setup of Samba is not (yet) supported > >>by RedHat or...

...>>> Rowland >>> >>>>> sssd unsupported? You must be joking. It's Red Hat! OK, it costs a >>>>> fortune >>>>> but you can always get the Fedora version with mailing list support. >>>>> Or, >>>>> build it yourslef even. >>>> I am talking about "supported by Samba upstream", >>>> not about "supported by a vendor or distribution". >>>> >>>> Also, in case you are not aware: >>>> The AD/DC setup of Samba is not (yet) supported >&g...

With the help of the Rails Recipes have got a self-referential HABTM relationship working, but I''m really struggling with getting a new entry from a form accepted. i should say here that the form is also submitting info for the join table too. So in my model I have: class Type < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :subtypes, :class_name => ''Type'',

Good day all. This is one of the most frustrating days I have had with Rails in quite some time now (almost 8 months actually). Yesterday I complete my development and testing and everything is peachy. I head home for the evening and do my things there. This morning, I come back in and do my typical morning routine of starting up eclipse and the usual "ruby script/server" command in