Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "yourlog".
Did you mean:
yourlogo
2020 Jul 01
3
Samba-4.10.4 strange behaviour
...ort = yes
??? # it turns out that using SMB1 via linux/rsync
??? # is leading to wrong permissions in our case
??? min protocol = SMB2
[gluster-replicated]
??? comment =
??? vfs objects = fruit streams_xattr glusterfs
??? glusterfs:volume = yourGlusterVolume
??? glusterfs:logfile = /var/log/samba/yourLog.log
??? glusterfs:loglevel = 1
??? inherit acls = yes
??? path = /
??? read only = no
??? guest ok = no
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
? ?????, 1 ??? 2020 ?., 19:33:12 ?. ???????+3, Felix K?lzow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> ??????:
Dear Strahil,
please find my current setti...
2020 Jul 01
3
Samba-4.10.4 strange behaviour
Hello All,
I'm new to the list and I don't have much of experience with samba.
I have a test setup on CentOS 7.8 with samba-4.10.4 and samba-vfs-glusterfs .
When my client mounts the samba share via vers=1.0 , the user sees the share properly (uid,gid,mode are just like on gluster). When the share is mounted with vers=2.0 or not specified (anything higher) the files are owned by
2020 Jul 01
0
Samba-4.10.4 strange behaviour
...es
??? # it turns out that using SMB1 via linux/rsync
??? # is leading to wrong permissions in our case
??? min protocol = SMB2
[gluster-replicated]
??? comment =
??? vfs objects = fruit streams_xattr glusterfs
??? glusterfs:volume = yourGlusterVolume
??? glusterfs:logfile = /var/log/samba/yourLog.log
??? glusterfs:loglevel = 1
??? inherit acls = yes
??? path = /
??? read only = no
??? guest ok = no
Please let me know if this works for you.
Regards,
Felix
On 01/07/2020 18:08, Strahil Nikolov via samba wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'm new to the list and I don't have mu...