Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "ymm11".
Did you mean:
ymm1
2012 Jan 09
3
[LLVMdev] Calling conventions for YMM registers on AVX
On Jan 9, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2012, at 11:18 PM, Demikhovsky, Elena wrote:
>
>> I'll explain what we see in the code.
>> 1. The caller saves XMM registers across the call if needed (according to DEFS definition).
>> YMMs are not in the set, so caller does not take care.
>
> This is not how the register allocator
2012 Mar 01
3
[LLVMdev] Stack alignment on X86 AVX seems incorrect
...essage-ID:
<A0DC88CEB3010344830D52D66533DA8E0C2E7A at HASMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
./llc -mattr=+avx -stack-alignment=16 < basic.ll | grep movaps | grep ymm |
grep rbp
vmovaps -176(%rbp), %ymm14
vmovaps -144(%rbp), %ymm11
vmovaps -240(%rbp), %ymm13
vmovaps -208(%rbp), %ymm9
vmovaps -272(%rbp), %ymm7
vmovaps -304(%rbp), %ymm0
vmovaps -112(%rbp), %ymm0
vmovaps -80(%rbp), %ymm1
vmovaps -112(%rbp), %ymm0
vmovaps -80(%rbp), %ymm0
vmovaps -176(%rbp), %ymm15...
2012 Jan 10
0
[LLVMdev] Calling conventions for YMM registers on AVX
...egs<"ymm8", [XMM8, XMM8b]>, DwarfRegNum<[25, -2, -2]>;
def YMM9: RegisterWithSubRegs<"ymm9", [XMM9, XMM9b]>, DwarfRegNum<[26, -2, -2]>;
def YMM10: RegisterWithSubRegs<"ymm10", [XMM10, XMM10b]>, DwarfRegNum<[27, -2, -2]>;
def YMM11: RegisterWithSubRegs<"ymm11", [XMM11, XMM11b]>, DwarfRegNum<[28, -2, -2]>;
def YMM12: RegisterWithSubRegs<"ymm12", [XMM12, XMM12b]>, DwarfRegNum<[29, -2, -2]>;
def YMM13: RegisterWithSubRegs<"ymm13", [XMM13, XMM13b]>, DwarfRegNum<[3...
2012 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] Stack alignment on X86 AVX seems incorrect
./llc -mattr=+avx -stack-alignment=16 < basic.ll | grep movaps | grep ymm | grep rbp
vmovaps -176(%rbp), %ymm14
vmovaps -144(%rbp), %ymm11
vmovaps -240(%rbp), %ymm13
vmovaps -208(%rbp), %ymm9
vmovaps -272(%rbp), %ymm7
vmovaps -304(%rbp), %ymm0
vmovaps -112(%rbp), %ymm0
vmovaps -80(%rbp), %ymm1
vmovaps -112(%rbp), %ymm0
vmovaps -80(%rbp), %ymm0
vmovaps -176(%rbp),...
2012 Mar 01
2
[LLVMdev] Stack alignment in kernel
I'm running in AVX mode, but the stack before call to kernel is aligned to 16 bit.
Could you, please, tell me where it should be specified?
Thank you.
- Elena
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
2012 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] Stack alignment on X86 AVX seems incorrect
...HASMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>> ./llc -mattr=+avx -stack-alignment=16 < basic.ll | grep movaps | grep
>> ymm | grep rbp
>> vmovaps -176(%rbp), %ymm14
>> vmovaps -144(%rbp), %ymm11
>> vmovaps -240(%rbp), %ymm13
>> vmovaps -208(%rbp), %ymm9
>> vmovaps -272(%rbp), %ymm7
>> vmovaps -304(%rbp), %ymm0
>> vmovaps -112(%rbp), %ymm0
>> vmovaps -80(%rbp), %ymm1
>> vmovaps -112(%rbp), %ymm0
>&...
2012 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] Stack alignment on X86 AVX seems incorrect
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Cameron McInally
<cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu>wrote:
> Aligning the stack to 32 bytes when there are auto AVX vector variables
>> present shouldn't necessarily break the x86-64 ABI, as long as smaller auto
>> variables remain properly aligned. A similar approach was taken for i386
>> in GCC in order to support SSE vectors.
>>
2012 Mar 01
3
[LLVMdev] Stack alignment on X86 AVX seems incorrect
...n if you explicitly specify –stack-alignment=16 the aligned movs are still generated.
It is not an issue related to ABI.
See my original mail:
./llc -mattr=+avx -stack-alignment=16 < basic.ll | grep movaps | grep ymm | grep rbp
vmovaps -176(%rbp), %ymm14
vmovaps -144(%rbp), %ymm11
vmovaps -240(%rbp), %ymm13
- Elena
From: Cameron McInally [mailto:cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 01:04
To: Evandro Menezes
Cc: Demikhovsky, Elena; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Stack alignment on X86 AVX seems incorrect
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:...
2012 Mar 01
4
[LLVMdev] Stack alignment on X86 AVX seems incorrect
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Evandro Menezes <emenezes at codeaurora.org>wrote:
...
> Aligning the stack to 32 bytes when there are auto AVX vector variables
> present shouldn't necessarily break the x86-64 ABI, as long as smaller auto
> variables remain properly aligned. A similar approach was taken for i386
> in GCC in order to support SSE vectors.
>
> Perhaps
2014 Feb 21
2
[LLVMdev] [lldb-dev] How is variable info retrieved in debugging for executables generated by llvm backend?
...ize:256;offset:563;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint8;set:Floating
> Point Registers;gcc:26;dwarf:26;#00
> $qRegisterInfo65#ad
> $name:ymm10;bitsize:256;offset:595;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint8;set:Floating
> Point Registers;gcc:27;dwarf:27;#00
> $qRegisterInfo66#ae
> $name:ymm11;bitsize:256;offset:627;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint8;set:Floating
> Point Registers;gcc:28;dwarf:28;#00
> $qRegisterInfo67#af
> $name:ymm12;bitsize:256;offset:659;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint8;set:Floating
> Point Registers;gcc:29;dwarf:29;#00
> $qRegisterInfo68#b0
> $...
2014 Feb 20
2
[LLVMdev] [lldb-dev] How is variable info retrieved in debugging for executables generated by llvm backend?
Thank you, Clayton. This is very helpful.
We use the LLDB specific GDB remote extensions, and our debugger server
supports "qRegisterInfo" package. "reg 0x3c" is the frame pointer.
In the example mentioned above, we have SP = FP - 40 for current call frame.
And variable "a" is stored at address (FP + -24) from asm instruction [FP +
-24] = R3;;
Thus we can conclude