Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "yfhazvjpz9xo5ugv9qrdzrpo4ke".
2015 Dec 07
0
Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL
...56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=SSct
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2015 Dec 07
4
Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL
On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:57:01PM +0100, Zdenek Sedlak wrote:
>
>> AFAIK, the 7(1503) format is used only on the websites, and internally
>> CentOS uses 7.1.1503. Do you see this as an issue?
>
> Yes. It confuses humans. There have been a bunch of examples given of
> how it confuses