Displaying 20 results from an estimated 26 matches for "yermolovich".
2020 Nov 13
3
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...far, I would like to give it a shot at implementing and collecting some performance numbers. đ
Alex
________________________________
From: James Henderson <jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk>
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 2:20 AM
To: Fangrui Song <maskray at google.com>
Cc: Alexander Yermolovich <ayermolo at fb.com>; Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com>; David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>; Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>; Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [llv...
2020 Nov 13
0
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:43 PM Alexander Yermolovich <ayermolo at fb.com>
wrote:
>
> Looks like there is an agreement that this path, modifying lld to order
sections using relocations, should be explored.
> If Igor doesn't object, since he was primary one driving DWARF64 so far,
I would like to give it a shot at implementing and co...
2020 Nov 12
3
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
On 2020-11-12, Alexander Yermolovich wrote:
>Thanks for feedback.
>
>I agree with patch and numbers this will be a more concrete discussion, but I wanted to judge overall receptiveness to this approach and see maybe there was a better way.
>
>"Whilst the majority of objects will only have a single CU in them, there...
2020 Nov 17
2
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
On 2020-11-14, Alexander Yermolovich wrote:
>Thanks for doing a diff and asking in other groups.
>
>So if I understand your concern with using first reloc as it relates to .debug_str.
>
>In DWARF4 for .debug_str is referenced from .debug_info, .debug_type using DW_FORM_strp. For DWARF32 it's 32bit unsigned, for DWAR...
2020 Nov 17
0
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: FÄng-ruĂŹ Sòng <maskray at google.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 1:51 AM
> To: Alexander Yermolovich <ayermolo at fb.com>
> Cc: David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>; Wenlei He <wenlei at fb.com>; llvm-
> dev at lists.llvm.org; Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com>; James
> Henderson <jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk>; Eric Christopher
> <echristo a...
2020 Nov 11
2
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
This year Igor Kudrin put in a lot of work in enabling DWARF64 support in LLVM. At Facebook we are looking into it as one of the options for handling debug information over 4gigs in production environment. One concern is that due to mix of third party libraries and llvm compiled code the final library/binary will have a mix of CU that are DWARF32/64. This is supported by DWARF format. With this
2020 Nov 13
3
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...ogle.com>
Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 02:10, Fangrui Song <maskray at google.com<mailto:maskray at google.com>> wrote:
On 2020-11-12, Alexander Yermolovich wrote:
>Thanks for feedback.
>
>I agree with patch and numbers this will be a more concrete discussion, but I wanted to judge overall receptiveness to this approach and see maybe there was a better way.
>
>"Whilst the majority of objects will only have a single CU in them, there...
2020 Nov 11
2
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...c/str/macro for instance, if I recall correctly)...
and if something has some 4 and 5, does it get sorted to the start? I
guess so.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 9:30 PM Eric Christopher via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:19 AM Alexander Yermolovich via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> This year Igor Kudrin put in a lot of work in enabling DWARF64 support in LLVM. At Facebook we are looking into it as one of the options for handling debug information over 4gigs in production environment. One concern is that...
2020 Nov 11
0
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:19 AM Alexander Yermolovich via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> This year Igor Kudrin put in a lot of work in enabling DWARF64 support in
> LLVM. At Facebook we are looking into it as one of the options for handling
> debug information over 4gigs in production environment. One concern is that
&...
2020 Nov 14
0
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...ly specify the ordering within the output .debug_str section.
Thank You
Alex
________________________________
From: FÄng-ruĂŹ Sòng <maskray at google.com>
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 12:42 PM
To: David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
Cc: Wenlei He <wenlei at fb.com>; Alexander Yermolovich <ayermolo at fb.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com>; James Henderson <jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk>; Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>; Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com>
Subje...
2020 Nov 13
4
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...> > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 02:10, Fangrui Song <maskray at google.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2020-11-12, Alexander Yermolovich wrote:
> > > > > > >Thanks for feedback.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >I agree with patch and numbers this will be a more concrete discussion, but I wanted to judge overall receptiveness to this approach and see maybe there was a better wa...
2020 Nov 12
0
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 02:10, Fangrui Song <maskray at google.com> wrote:
> On 2020-11-12, Alexander Yermolovich wrote:
> >Thanks for feedback.
> >
> >I agree with patch and numbers this will be a more concrete discussion,
> but I wanted to judge overall receptiveness to this approach and see maybe
> there was a better way.
> >
> >"Whilst the majority of objects will o...
2020 Nov 11
3
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...; >
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 9:30 PM Eric Christopher via llvm-dev
>> >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:19 AM Alexander Yermolovich via llvm-dev
>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This year Igor Kudrin put in a lot of work in enabling DWARF64
>> support in LLVM. At Facebook we are looking into it as one of the options
>> for handling debug informa...
2020 Nov 13
2
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 02:10, Fangrui Song <maskray at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-11-12, Alexander Yermolovich wrote:
> > >Thanks for feedback.
> > >
> > >I agree with patch and numbers this will be a more concrete discussion, but I wanted to judge overall receptiveness to this approach and see maybe there was a better way.
> > >
> > >"Whilst the majority of...
2020 Nov 19
1
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
On 19.11.2020 03:21, Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> If the .debug_str section *by itself* exceeds 4GB, then yes any string
>>> with a 32-bit reference to it must be in the first 4GB. Strings that
>>> have only 64-bit references to them can be sorted to the end of the
>>> section, if necessary. I wouldn't think anyone guarantees or cares
>>> about the
2020 Nov 16
0
LLVM Weekly - #359, November 16th 2020
...permail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146568.html),
e.g. to support lowering to FCMLA on AArch64.
* ORC JIT Weekly #26 [is
out](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146633.html),
covering he Orc library break-up, remote TargetProcessControl, and the
beginnings of a runtime.
* Alexander Yermolovich started a discussion on [supporting DWARF64 with
`debug_info` sorting in
LLD](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146522.html).
* Sean Silva posted an RFC on [adding new `SVec<T> ` and `Vec<T>` convenience
wrappers for
SmallVector](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llv...
2020 Nov 12
0
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...grui Song <maskray at google.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 2:59 PM
To: Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com>; James Henderson <jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>; Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>; Alexander Yermolovich <ayermolo at fb.com>; Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com>; 'llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org' <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
(Adding back Cc: which got dropped)
> (Igor - I don't know what...
2020 Nov 13
2
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...64, debug_info "sorting"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 02:10, Fangrui Song <maskray at google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 2020-11-12, Alexander Yermolovich wrote:
> > > > >Thanks for feedback.
> > > > >
> > > > >I agree with patch and numbers this will be a more concrete discussion, but I wanted to judge overall receptiveness to this approach and see maybe there was a better way.
> > > > >
&g...
2020 Nov 11
3
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...linkers and DWARF producers. I don't have one as yet though.
>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 9:30 PM Eric Christopher via llvm-dev
>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:19 AM Alexander Yermolovich via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This year Igor Kudrin put in a lot of work in enabling DWARF64 support in LLVM. At Facebook we are looking into it as one of the options for handling debug information over 4gigs in production environment. On...
2020 Nov 13
0
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 02:10, Fangrui Song <maskray at google.com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-11-12, Alexander Yermolovich wrote:
> >Thanks for feedback.
> >
> >I agree with patch and numbers this will be a more concrete discussion, but I wanted to judge overall receptiveness to this approach and see maybe there was a better way.
> >
> >"Whilst the majority of objects will only have a...