Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "yehua".
Did you mean:
yehuda
2016 Dec 30
0
About error: 'Windows cannot access, you do not have permission to access'
...mba.org] Namens Rowland Penny via
> samba
> Verzonden: donderdag 29 december 2016 10:43
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] About error: 'Windows cannot access, you do not
> have permission to access'
>
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:54:43 +0000
> Chenyehua <chen.yehua at h3c.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your attention.
> > First, use local users at samba server, and client login success.
> >
> > [global]
> > workgroup = H3C ONESTOR
> > server string = %h server (Samba NAS)
> > dns proxy = n...
2016 Dec 29
5
答复: About error: 'Windows cannot access, you do not have permission to access'
...his error.
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] 代表 Rowland Penny via samba
发送时间: 2016年12月27日 21:59
收件人: samba at lists.samba.org
主题: Re: [Samba] About error: 'Windows cannot access, you do not have permission to access'
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:34:24 +0000
Chenyehua via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> HI
> I have a linux samba server and lists users at this server. and access
> the folder from the windows7 client. Now i configure a LDAP sever and
> let samba to use it . But I don’t want clients keeping the connection
> because I...
2016 Nov 24
0
Any news about the patch for the CA feature?
Hi Jeremy
Sorry to disturb you.
I notice that at several months ago, you offered a patch about the frontend SMB support for the CA feature at mailing list(as shown below).
Thanks for your help and thanks for the generosity of Simplivity. It benefits me a lot.
Then, up to now,
1) Are there any updated versions about this frontend patch?
2) Are there any patches about
2017 Mar 01
0
The connection would be broken when read rate is too big
Hi samba-team,
I met a problem recently:
Problem Description:
The connection would be broken when read rate is too big.
Environment:
Samba 4.3.11
Ubuntu server 14.04
Configuration:
usershare allow guests = yes
max protocol = SMB3
large readwrite = yes
use sendfile = yes
aio read size = 1024
oplocks = yes
deadtime = 10
aio write behind = true
clustering = yes
store dos
2017 Mar 02
1
How to print the log in socket_wrapper.c
Hi folks
I want to print the log in socket_wrapper.c to have a better view of the read or write socket behavior.
I find that there are four debug levels:
SWRAP_LOG_ERROR
SWRAP_LOG_WARN
SWRAP_LOG_DEBUG
SWRAP_LOG_TRACE
So:
Where and How to set those debug levels?
Where can I find the log?
Or:
Are there any other ways to print the log?(I
2017 Mar 13
1
Any risks of modifying tcp_keepidle etc params?
Hi folks
Recently, I find that the number of the smbd connections may increase if the network is abnormal. And the repeated connections will exist for a long time (which is not accepted for me)
So, I modify the following params and shorten the existing time of those repeated connections:
TCP_KEEPCNT 3
TCP_KEEPIDLE 60
TCP_KEEPINTVL 15
My concern is that:
Are there any
2017 May 16
0
Oplock break failed for file xxx -- replying anyway
Hi folks
Recently I met a problem and found “Oplock break failed for file xxx -- replying anyway” in the log, here is the detail:
1) Background:
A、 Client: windows 7 SP1(pc)
B、 Server: Samba 4.3.11
C、 Protocol: SMB2.1
2) Phenomenon:
A、 I tried to open my shared directory, and found it was really slow to open(needs 30 more seconds),(Lately I found that same lnk type files existed
2017 Feb 09
0
转发: 转发: 答复: ??????: Is the "\\x.x.x.x" type tree connect request a client related feature?
...-----邮件原件-----
发件人: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] 代表 Rowland Penny via samba
发送时间: 2017年2月8日 21:23
收件人: samba at lists.samba.org
主题: Re: [Samba] 转发: 答复: ??????: Is the "\\x.x.x.x" type tree connect request a client related feature?
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 12:10:00 +0000
Chenyehua via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Thanks for your response, Rowland.
> Sorry for the late reply.
> Here is my smb.conf:
>
> [global]
> workgroup = grouptest1
>
> server string = %h server (Samba NAS)
>
> dns proxy = no
>
> log file...
2016 Dec 02
2
Is it fine to store the tdb files in the shared directory to solve the ctdb data synchronization problem?
Hi folks
I face a problem about the data synchronization when using the ctdb. When one ctdb node fails, other ctdb nodes may not recover the data of the failed node. I think it may be due to the fact that ctdb stores its tdb files in the local storage. So, is it fine to store the tdb files in the shared directory of the backend storage? When one node fails, other nodes may recover the data from
2016 Dec 02
1
答复: Is it fine to store the tdb files in the shared directory to solve the ctdb data synchronization problem?
...(just a simple guess, not test yet)
Do you have any other solutions or suggestions about this data synchronization problem?
Looking forward to your reply, thanks.
Best regards
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: vlendec at samba.org [mailto:vlendec at samba.org] 代表 Volker Lendecke
发送时间: 2016年12月2日 18:55
收件人: chenyehua 11692 (RD)
抄送: samba at lists.samba.org
主题: Re: [Samba] Is it fine to store the tdb files in the shared directory to solve the ctdb data synchronization problem?
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:45:53AM +0000, Chenyehua via samba wrote:
> I face a problem about the data synchronization when using...
2016 Dec 27
2
About error: 'Windows cannot access, you do not have permission to access'
HI
I have a linux samba server and lists users at this server. and access the folder from the windows7 client.
Now i configure a LDAP sever and let samba to use it .
But I don’t want clients keeping the connection because I have changed the authentication,clinets need to re-login.
So I restart smbd. and it works.
Then,let clients reconnect to samba, but it report errors: Windows cannot access
2016 Dec 27
2
Is the "\\x.x.x.x" type tree connect request a client related feature?
Hi folks
I face a problem when using the samba share, Here is the detail:
1) Phenomenon
In windows 7, sometimes, I type the samba server ip address and can see the shared folder. (the samba version is 4.3.11)
a、However when I try to open the shared folder, it fails with a windows error message like “please check the spelling of the name, or some problem may related to the network”, and
2017 Feb 08
0
转发: 答复: ??????: Is the "\\x.x.x.x" type tree connect request a client related feature?
...!
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] 代表 Rowland Penny via samba
发送时间: 2017年1月22日 19:47
收件人: samba at lists.samba.org
主题: Re: [Samba] 答复: ??????: Is the "\\x.x.x.x" type tree connect request a client related feature?
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:04:29 +0000
Chenyehua via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, Louis
> However, I am still blocked by this problem now. !-_- I tried to set
> the samba server as the DNS server and visit the shared folder by
> input "\\aaa.bb.com" at windows 7 client. In some case...
2016 Dec 29
3
答复: Is the "\\x.x.x.x" type tree connect request a client related feature?
...ot;MYDOMAIN" then connections to "myservername.mydomain.com" would result in a conflict of the samba domain name with the DNS domain name.
This caused problems with Microsoft Excel and Powerpoint not trusting documents from an "insecure" source.
On 12/27/16 05:44, Chenyehua via samba wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I face a problem when using the samba share, Here is the detail:
>
> 1) Phenomenon
>
> In windows 7, sometimes, I type the samba server ip address and
> can see the shared folder. (the samba version is 4.3.11)
>
> a、However when...
2017 Jan 22
4
答复: ??????: Is the "\\x.x.x.x" type tree connect request a client related feature?
...d in with a domain joined pc and user.
Its all in nameing and DNS related problems.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Gaiseric
> Vandal via samba
> Verzonden: donderdag 29 december 2016 15:42
> Aan: Chenyehua
> CC: 'samba at lists.samba.org'
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] ??????: Is the "\\x.x.x.x" type tree connect
> request a client related feature?
>
> It seems like you have two problems going on at once with your server
>
> 1. User authentication following a cha...